2000
DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/83.5.1141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Biotin and Folate in Infant Formula and Milk by Optical Biosensor-Based Immunoassay

Abstract: Biomolecular interaction analysis was evaluated for the automated analysis of biotin- and folate-supplemented infant formulas and milk powders. The technique was configured as a biosensor-based, nonlabeled inhibition immunoassay using monoclonal antibodies raised against analyte-conjugate. Sample extraction conditions were optimized and antibodies were evaluated for cross-reactivity. Performance parameters included a quantitation range of 2–70 ng/mL, recoveries of 86–102%, agreement against assigned reference … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After independent full-text review, the reviewers met to exclude articles (n = 41) after reaching a final agreement for the following reasons: matrix is not food or potable water (n = 32), no interference study was conducted (n = 2), no dynamic range or limit of detection were studied (n = 4), and previously reported sensors in prior studies (n = 3). A total of 42 sensors (Aksuner, Henden, Yenigul, Yilmaz, & Cukurovali, 2011;Alexander, Dimitrakopoulos, & Hibbert, 1997 Hosseini et al, 2010;Indyk et al, 2000;Indyk et al, 2002;L. Kong et al, 2016;Kumar et al, 2014;Lermo et al, 2009;W.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After independent full-text review, the reviewers met to exclude articles (n = 41) after reaching a final agreement for the following reasons: matrix is not food or potable water (n = 32), no interference study was conducted (n = 2), no dynamic range or limit of detection were studied (n = 4), and previously reported sensors in prior studies (n = 3). A total of 42 sensors (Aksuner, Henden, Yenigul, Yilmaz, & Cukurovali, 2011;Alexander, Dimitrakopoulos, & Hibbert, 1997 Hosseini et al, 2010;Indyk et al, 2000;Indyk et al, 2002;L. Kong et al, 2016;Kumar et al, 2014;Lermo et al, 2009;W.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples presented in this issue include allergens (Immer et al, 2004), hormones (Johansson & Hellenas, 2004) and drug residues (Myrtazina et al, 2004). Other analytes in food for which immunoassays have been developed include pesticides (Bonwick et al, 1996b), plant gums (Thurston et al, 1998), vitamins (Indyk et al, 2000), fungal toxins ) and pathogens (de Boer & Beumer, 1999). Tests for food processing such as irradiation have also been reported (Williams et al, 1994).…”
Section: Typical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most rapidly expanding areas of biosensor use is quality control, contaminant detection and concentration analysis in the food/dairy industries and environmental settings. For example, biosensors are being used to quantitate nutrient and antibiotic levels in foodstuffs, 392,395,405,406 bacterial and fungal contamination in food, 32,398 and air-and water-borne toxins, pesticides and herbicides. 212,410,426 The on-site, on-line capabilities of biosensors, coupled with the technology's high sensitivity and miniscule sample requirements, make these instruments ideal tools to monitor food and environmental safety.…”
Section: Food Testing and Environmental Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%