2007
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.200600433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of anti‐inflammatory drugs and estrogens in water by HPLC with UV detection

Abstract: An analytical method based on LC and UV detection has been developed for the determination of anti-inflammatory compounds and estrogens in water samples. The drugs investigated were diclofenac, ketoprofen, ibuprofen, naproxen, clofibric acid, estriol, 17beta-estradiol, estrone and ethynylestradiol. The detection limits were in the range of 6-74 microg/L and 0.041 -0.16 mg/L for acidic pharmaceuticals and estrogens, respectively, using narrow-bore C18 analytical column. Analyte enrichment from water samples was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity of method expressed as Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantification (LOQ) values were calculated based on linear regression method ranges from 2.5-11.7 and 7.5-35.4 µg L −1 , respectively. The LOD and LOQ for this method were lower than those reported whereby the LOD and LOQ ranges from 6-74 and 60-200 µg L −1 , respectively (Chandra and Dutt Sharma, 2013;Stafiej et al, 2007). The LOD and LOQ values are also comparable to those reported in the literature (Aguilar-Arteaga et al, 2010).…”
Section: Methods Validationsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The sensitivity of method expressed as Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantification (LOQ) values were calculated based on linear regression method ranges from 2.5-11.7 and 7.5-35.4 µg L −1 , respectively. The LOD and LOQ for this method were lower than those reported whereby the LOD and LOQ ranges from 6-74 and 60-200 µg L −1 , respectively (Chandra and Dutt Sharma, 2013;Stafiej et al, 2007). The LOD and LOQ values are also comparable to those reported in the literature (Aguilar-Arteaga et al, 2010).…”
Section: Methods Validationsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…It was known that diethylstilbestrol and estriol were bound to the estrone-imprinted polymer by hydrophobic interaction (that is non-specific adsorption) and it was easier to destroy this interaction by addition of methanol [30]. Acetic acid can increase the eluting strength, weaken the binding of template to the imprinted polymer, and release the template from the imprinted cavity of the stationary phase more quickly [4]. The effect of the concentration of acetic acid in the eluent was studied in the range of 0.1 to 6.0%.…”
Section: Optimization Of the Mispe Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydrogen bonds between MAA and 4-(dimethoxyphosphorothioylamino)butanoic acid were weak and could be broken by acetic acid. 30 As a result, specific recognition sites and imprinted cavities were formed after removal of the template molecule, and the MIP monolithic column was synthesized.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%