2016
DOI: 10.1016/s2212-5671(16)30294-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of Undeclared Work in the EU Member States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Things get more interesting when going deeper into the tree. In most cases, the third-best choice for filtering wrongdoers was their age, which exerts a substantial negative effect on the propensity to participate in the undeclared sphere (as already evidenced by, e.g., Arendt et al 2020 ; Hofmann et al 2017 ; Popescu et al 2016 ). The only exception was individuals with low tax morale who have an undeclared worker in their surroundings (the rightmost rectangle in layer 3).…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Things get more interesting when going deeper into the tree. In most cases, the third-best choice for filtering wrongdoers was their age, which exerts a substantial negative effect on the propensity to participate in the undeclared sphere (as already evidenced by, e.g., Arendt et al 2020 ; Hofmann et al 2017 ; Popescu et al 2016 ). The only exception was individuals with low tax morale who have an undeclared worker in their surroundings (the rightmost rectangle in layer 3).…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…; 9: business proprietor; 10: employed professional (doctor, etc. ); 11: general management; 12: middle management; 13: employed position, et desk; 14: employed position, travelling; 15: employed position, service job; 16: supervisor; 17: skilled manual worker; 18: unskilled manual worker 0 Franic and Cichocki ( 2021 ), Gregorio and Giordano ( 2016 ), Kayaoglu and Williams ( 2017 ), Strielkowski and Čábelková ( 2015 ), Williams et al ( 2015a ), Windebank and Horodnic ( 2017 ) Size of the company Categorical 0: not working or self-employed without workers; 1: 1–4 employees; 2: 5–9 employees; 3: 10–19 employees; 4: 20–49 employees; 5: 50–99 employees; 6: 100–499 employees; 7: 500 + employees 772 Elek and Köllő ( 2019 ), Franic and Cichocki ( 2021 ), Popescu et al ( 2016 ), Vallanti and Gianfreda ( 2020 ), Williams et al ( 2015a ) Financial difficulties Categorical 1: most of the time; 2: from time to time; 3: almost never/never 388 Arendt et al ( 2020 ), Boone et al ( 2013 ), Hofmann et al ( 2017 ), Popescu et al ( 2016 ), Williams and Efendic ( 2021 ), Williams and Horodnic ( 2015a , b ), Williams et al ( 2015a , b ) Social class (self-assessed) Categorical 1: working class; 2: lower middle class; 3: middle class; 4: upper-middle class; 5: higher class 868 Williams et al ( 2015a , b ), Williams and Horodnic ( 2015a ), Williams and Horodnic ( 2017b ) Perceptions and attitudes Perceived detection risk Categorical 1: very high; 2: fairly high; 3...…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%