2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretai.2005.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of retail patronage: A meta-analytical perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
508
5
24

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 589 publications
(583 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
18
508
5
24
Order By: Relevance
“…Thang and Tan (2003) included accessibility with other exterior variables like merchandising, promotion, facilities and services, and found that accessibility ranked high. Pan and Zinkhan (2006) conducted an extensive literature search and were able to include in a meta-analysis 45 studies that involved determinants of repatronage behaviour. They found that levels of services and accessibility were all significantly related to the repatronage behaviour of customers.…”
Section: Exterior Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thang and Tan (2003) included accessibility with other exterior variables like merchandising, promotion, facilities and services, and found that accessibility ranked high. Pan and Zinkhan (2006) conducted an extensive literature search and were able to include in a meta-analysis 45 studies that involved determinants of repatronage behaviour. They found that levels of services and accessibility were all significantly related to the repatronage behaviour of customers.…”
Section: Exterior Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particular temporal and spatial aspects of shopping in terms of distance or accessibility have received considerable attention since seminal work from Reilly (1931) and Huff (1964), for example Fotheringham (1988), Grace and O'Cass (2005), Pan and Zinkhan (2006) and Reutterer and Teller (2009). Some other authors have focussed on convenience by providing infrastructural services (e.g.…”
Section: Store-based Retailingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopt the later definition in this study, which treats store image construct as a multi-attribute model, consisting of both tangible and intangible attributes such as merchandise quality and assortment as well as the store atmosphere (Hartman & Spiro, 2005;McGoldrick, 2002). Past research has shown that customers often evaluate and select retailers on the basis of store image (Chang & Luan, 2010), and that store image is as an important antecedent of store satisfaction and loyalty (Bloemer & De Ruyter, 1998;Martenson, 2007), store preference (Thang & Tan, 2003), and the frequency of store visits (Pan & Zinkhan, 2006). Thus, we have H 2 : Store image has a positive effect on patronage intention.…”
Section: Store Imagementioning
confidence: 99%