2010
DOI: 10.1257/aer.100.4.1572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of Redistributive Politics: An Empirical Analysis of Land Reforms in West Bengal, India

Abstract: We investigate political determinants of land reform implementation in the Indian state of West Bengal. Using a village panel spanning 1974-98, we do not find evidence supporting the hypothesis that these can be explained by differences in redistributive ideologies of the Left Front and the Congress party, i.e., their relative control of local governments. Instead, the evidence is consistent with the role of opportunism (re-election concerns) and electoral competition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
40
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results for all the seats echoes the results obtained by Bardhan and Mookherjee (2010) in the context of land reforms in West Bengal. Clearly, if a party is very weak in a particular area or very strong, a party may not find it optimal to influence fund allocations to those areas.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The results for all the seats echoes the results obtained by Bardhan and Mookherjee (2010) in the context of land reforms in West Bengal. Clearly, if a party is very weak in a particular area or very strong, a party may not find it optimal to influence fund allocations to those areas.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This paper is similar in spirit to Bardhan and Mookherjee (2010) in so far as we estimate a similar inverted U shaped relationship between political variables and the outcome. However, the di §erential relationship within close elections is unexplored in their analysis.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations