This research investigates how crisis management and brand performance interact. Data from crisis management, such as signal detection, preparation and prevention, recovery and learning, and brand performance items, are used to evaluate the research model. Existing scales are used to measure all of the focal constructs. The Smart-PLS 3.0 software is used to check the psychometric properties of the rankings and test the hypotheses using partial least squares-based structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Building on literature from crisis management and brand performance. This study illustrates the role of signal detection, preparation, prevention, recovery, and learning in influencing brand performance. The perspective used in this study provides insight into how organizations can develop and manage brands from a process perspective. As a result, the endogenous variables crisis management and brand performance have adequate variance explained values, whereas brand performance has a medium conflict explaining the significance. To develop hotel managers, identify the factors that contribute to crisis management on the brand performance of up-scale hotels in Indonesia and may help hotel managers mitigate the effects of this crisis. This study draws on previous research on crisis management and brand performance to argue that organizations must not only maximize brand returns in the current market but also adapt to future changes.