2012
DOI: 10.1186/1753-6561-6-s5-p4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of patient satisfaction in public hospitals and their remediabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a tool that can be applied to improve quality, as its use enables the elimination of false flags and indicates ways of enhancing current activities, and, consequently, increasing efficiency [ 25 ]. The Pareto analysis of data in a study by Gupta et al on the satisfaction of patients from nine district hospitals in Bihar indicated that increasing patient satisfaction by more than 60% can be achieved by referring to the three highest attributes of dissatisfaction, i.e., a lack of availability of medicines, unsatisfactory time of consultation and cleanliness of the rooms [ 39 ]. The Pareto analysis of the research conducted by the Leźnicka et al, carried out with the help of the PASAT toolkit on 2280 patients, indicated that as many as one in four respondents (25%) declared a problem with information on patients’ rights.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a tool that can be applied to improve quality, as its use enables the elimination of false flags and indicates ways of enhancing current activities, and, consequently, increasing efficiency [ 25 ]. The Pareto analysis of data in a study by Gupta et al on the satisfaction of patients from nine district hospitals in Bihar indicated that increasing patient satisfaction by more than 60% can be achieved by referring to the three highest attributes of dissatisfaction, i.e., a lack of availability of medicines, unsatisfactory time of consultation and cleanliness of the rooms [ 39 ]. The Pareto analysis of the research conducted by the Leźnicka et al, carried out with the help of the PASAT toolkit on 2280 patients, indicated that as many as one in four respondents (25%) declared a problem with information on patients’ rights.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%