2014
DOI: 10.9734/bjemt/2014/7826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of Market Participation among Maize Producers in Oyo State, Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
33
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
9
33
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This demands the need to open up of more banana markets and value addition technologies including packaging to increase farmers' profit margins. Similar observations have been made by others and was attributed to high transaction costs [47,48].…”
Section: Output Market Accesssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This demands the need to open up of more banana markets and value addition technologies including packaging to increase farmers' profit margins. Similar observations have been made by others and was attributed to high transaction costs [47,48].…”
Section: Output Market Accesssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This means that the household contributed positively to market participation as the majority of the farmers have a low household size, which is associated with participation to markets, unlike high household size, which competes with markets for the harvested yields. Occupation was found to be positive sign and statistical significant at 5% with market participation, which indicates that those that take farming as their main occupation participate more in the market than any other group and the research findings are consistent with the work (Adeoti et al, 2014).…”
Section: Estimates Of the Heckman Model Of Farmers' Decision To Partisupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Where smallholder farmers receive better prices from informal markets, Zivenge and Karavina (2012) averred that these markets offer greater prospects for the development of communal farmers, as it contributes positively to rural welfare, household incomes and livelihoods. Smallholder farmers may also engage in transactions offering lower prices, resulting from their lack of storage facilities and to avoid transaction costs associated with searching for higher prices (Adeoti et al 2014;Osmani et al 2015).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%