2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of idiosyncratic volatility: Evidence from the Indian stock market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
9

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
21
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, with the presence of empirical evidence on the positive association between average stock returns and idiosyncratic volatility emphasises that investors demand a higher compensation for stocks with higher idiosyncratic volatility. More importantly, this empirical finding of positive association between average stock returns and idiosyncratic volatility is clearly in line with the previous empirical findings such as Kumari et al (2017), Fu (2009), and Pukthuanthong- Le and Visaltanachoti (2009).…”
Section: Model 08supporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, with the presence of empirical evidence on the positive association between average stock returns and idiosyncratic volatility emphasises that investors demand a higher compensation for stocks with higher idiosyncratic volatility. More importantly, this empirical finding of positive association between average stock returns and idiosyncratic volatility is clearly in line with the previous empirical findings such as Kumari et al (2017), Fu (2009), and Pukthuanthong- Le and Visaltanachoti (2009).…”
Section: Model 08supporting
confidence: 92%
“…The idiosyncratic volatility has been estimated in different methods and frequencies in the previous studies. For instance, Bali, Engle and Murray (2016) estimate the idiosyncratic volatility on the basis of, one month, three months, six months, twelve months, one year, two years, three years and five years while Kumari et al (2017), Fu (2009), Pukthuanthong- Le and Visaltanachoti (2009) and Xu and Malkiel (2003) estimate the idiosyncratic volatility on a monthly basis. Furthermore, in certain previous studies, one month lagged idiosyncratic volatility has been used to estimate the idiosyncratic volatility (Ang et al, 2006(Ang et al, , 2009Bali & Cakici, 2008;Bali, Engle & Murray, 2016;Malagon et al, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SMB = monthly returns of small size portfolios minus the daily returns of large size portfolios. For SMB portfolios are grouped into two by the previous year's market capitalization as Liu et al (2014) and Kumari, Mahakud, and Hiremath (2017). HML = calculated by the high group portfolio minus the small group portfolio as Liu et al (2014) and Kumari et al (2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For SMB portfolios are grouped into two by the previous year's market capitalization as Liu et al (2014) and Kumari, Mahakud, and Hiremath (2017). HML = calculated by the high group portfolio minus the small group portfolio as Liu et al (2014) and Kumari et al (2017). The portfolio is divided into 3 with the previous year's book to market equity into three groups, namely high, medium, and low.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%