2020
DOI: 10.1080/10454446.2020.1857318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of Household Choice of Dairy and Plant-based Milk Alternatives: Evidence from a Field Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They buy them, as a rule, not only for themselves, but also for other members of households with which they live together. Thus, they very often impose the type of products consumed on a daily basis, thus taking on a specific role of a "household leader" and following the current market trends (Boaitey and Kota, 2020).…”
Section: Research Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They buy them, as a rule, not only for themselves, but also for other members of households with which they live together. Thus, they very often impose the type of products consumed on a daily basis, thus taking on a specific role of a "household leader" and following the current market trends (Boaitey and Kota, 2020).…”
Section: Research Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies have compared different product types, such as dairy, meat, and fish, or have specifically addressed the consumer perspective on plant-based meat alternatives [ 24 ]. The recent body of literature on plant-based milk alternatives has covered brand image, buying motivation, and attribute preferences [ 19 , 20 , 33 ], consumer segmentation studies [ 24 ], and studies related to the health and beverage choices of adults and children. This study aims to add to the recent body of literature and explore drivers and inhibitors of consumer willingness to pay (WTP) and their willingness to pay more (WTPM) for plant-based milk alternatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a . STREAMS Studies References PRINCIPAL Vgt-Vgn 92 Allen et al [ 42 .I]; Arenas-Gaitán et al [ 8 ], Aschemann-Witzel & Peschel [ 43 ]; Bagci & Olgun [ 18 ]; Boaitey & Minegishi [ 44 ]; Bobić et al [ 45 ]; Brandner et al [ 46 ]; Braunsberger et al [ 47 ]; Brouwer et al [ 48 ]; Bryant [ 49 ]; Cardello et al, [ 50 ]; Chung et al [ 51 ]; Clark & Bogdan [ 20 ]; Cliceri et al [ 3 , 52 ]; Cramer et al [ 53 ]; Crnic [ 54 ]; Estell et al [ 55 ]; Falkeisen et al [ 56 ]; Feltz et al [ 57 ]; Ghaffari et al [ 58 ]; Gili et al [ 59 ]; Graça et al [ 60 .II, 61 ]; Haas et al [ 62 ]; Hibbeln et al [ 63 ]; Hoffman et al [ 64 ]; Isham et al [ 65 ]; Judge & Wilson [ 66 , 67 ]; Kessler et al [ 68 , 69 ]; Krizanova et al [ 70 ]; Krizanova & Guardiola [ 71 ]; Larsson et al [ 72 ]; Ma & Chang [ 73 ]; MacInnis & Hodson [ 74 , 75 ]; Montesdeoca et al [ 76 ]; Moore et al [ 77 ]; Moss et al [ 78 ]; Müssig et al [ 79 ]; ...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%