Abstract:BackgroundGastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common cause of discomfort and morbidity worldwide. However, information on determinants of GERD from large-scale studies in low- to medium-income countries is limited. We investigated the factors associated with different measures of GERD symptoms, including frequency, patient-perceived severity, and onset time.MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis of the baseline data from a population-based cohort study of ∼50,000 individuals in in Golestan Prov… Show more
“…From these we identified 365 that appeared to be relevant to the study question. There were 102 articles that fulfilled the eligibility criteria,11 19–119 representing 108 separate adult study populations, containing 460 984 subjects (see online supplementary figure S1). There were a further 12 papers that reported data concerning the prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms according to use of alcohol, smoking status, gender and age from one of these 108 separate study populations,120–131 which were not published in the primary article arising from that study, meaning that we extracted data from 114 separate articles in total.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of studies used accepted diagnostic criteria to define the presence of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms, with 26 using more than one set of criteria within the same population 11 29 31 36 42 46 51–54 59 64–66 72 75 83 87 88 91 92 95 96 102 108 119. Details of symptom frequency and duration required to meet criteria for gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms in each study are provided in online supplementary table S1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of symptom frequency and duration required to meet criteria for gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms in each study are provided in online supplementary table S1. In total, 79 studies (reporting 85 separate study populations) used a frequency of the presence of heart burn and/or regurgitation of at least once a week to define gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms,11 22 25 27–29 32–34 36 38 40 41 44 45–48 50–61 64–77 79–89 91–97 99–101 102 104 105 107–109 111–117 119 two studies used the Rome II criteria42 98 and two the Rome I criteria 23 62…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subgroup analyses were conducted according to geographical region, criteria used to define gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms, duration used to define presence of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms and method used to collect symptom data. The prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms was compared according to proposed risk factors, which were chosen a priori, and included age,14 gender,14 current smoking status,15 self-reported use or non-use of alcohol,15 self-reported use or non-use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and/or aspirin,16 presence or absence of obesity,15 socioeconomic status,11 and educational level,17 using an OR, with a 95% CI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms are prevalent, seen both in primary and secondary care settings 11. There have been numerous cross-sectional surveys conducted that report the prevalence of symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux in the community.…”
The prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms varied strikingly among countries, even when similar definitions were used to define their presence. Prevalence was significantly higher in subjects ≥50 years, smokers, NSAID users and obese individuals, although these associations were modest.
“…From these we identified 365 that appeared to be relevant to the study question. There were 102 articles that fulfilled the eligibility criteria,11 19–119 representing 108 separate adult study populations, containing 460 984 subjects (see online supplementary figure S1). There were a further 12 papers that reported data concerning the prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms according to use of alcohol, smoking status, gender and age from one of these 108 separate study populations,120–131 which were not published in the primary article arising from that study, meaning that we extracted data from 114 separate articles in total.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of studies used accepted diagnostic criteria to define the presence of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms, with 26 using more than one set of criteria within the same population 11 29 31 36 42 46 51–54 59 64–66 72 75 83 87 88 91 92 95 96 102 108 119. Details of symptom frequency and duration required to meet criteria for gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms in each study are provided in online supplementary table S1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of symptom frequency and duration required to meet criteria for gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms in each study are provided in online supplementary table S1. In total, 79 studies (reporting 85 separate study populations) used a frequency of the presence of heart burn and/or regurgitation of at least once a week to define gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms,11 22 25 27–29 32–34 36 38 40 41 44 45–48 50–61 64–77 79–89 91–97 99–101 102 104 105 107–109 111–117 119 two studies used the Rome II criteria42 98 and two the Rome I criteria 23 62…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subgroup analyses were conducted according to geographical region, criteria used to define gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms, duration used to define presence of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms and method used to collect symptom data. The prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms was compared according to proposed risk factors, which were chosen a priori, and included age,14 gender,14 current smoking status,15 self-reported use or non-use of alcohol,15 self-reported use or non-use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and/or aspirin,16 presence or absence of obesity,15 socioeconomic status,11 and educational level,17 using an OR, with a 95% CI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms are prevalent, seen both in primary and secondary care settings 11. There have been numerous cross-sectional surveys conducted that report the prevalence of symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux in the community.…”
The prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms varied strikingly among countries, even when similar definitions were used to define their presence. Prevalence was significantly higher in subjects ≥50 years, smokers, NSAID users and obese individuals, although these associations were modest.
Prior studies have conflicting findings regarding the association between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We examined this relationship in a prospective cohort in a region of high ESCC incidence. Baseline exposure data were collected from 50 045 individuals using in‐person interviews at the time of cohort entry. Participants were followed until they developed cancer, died, or were lost to follow up. Participants with GERD symptoms were categorized into any GERD (heartburn or regurgitation), mixed symptoms, or heartburn alone. Multivariable Cox regression was used to assess the relationship between GERD symptom group and histologically confirmed ESCC. The model was adjusted for known risk factors for GERD and ESCC. 49 559 individuals were included in this study, of which 9005 had GERD symptoms. Over 13.0 years of median follow up, 290 individuals were diagnosed with ESCC. We found no association between any GERD and risk of ESCC (aHR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.66‐1.24, P = .54). Similar findings were observed for the GERD symptom subtypes. Significant interactions between any GERD and sex (P = .013) as well as tobacco smoking (P = .028) were observed. In post‐hoc analyses, GERD was associated with a decreased risk of ESCC in men (aHR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.27‐0.98 P = .04) and in smokers (aHR 0.26, 95% CI: 0.08‐0.83 P = .02). While there was little evidence for an overall association between GERD symptoms and ESCC risk, significant interactions with sex and smoking were observed. Men and smokers with GERD symptoms had a lower risk of ESCC development.
Despite rising worldwide prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), conclusive diagnosis of clinically significant GERD remains elusive, both in New York and in New Delhi. GERD is unique in that diagnosis and management are pursued simultaneously, and indeed, the same diagnostic approach can also be therapeutic, e.g. the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) trial. Currently available tools for GERD diagnosis rely on subjective clinical historyorquestionnairedata,complementedbyobjectivemeasuresof macroscopic and microscopic mucosal integrity, reflux burden, and esophageal pathophysiology. Consequently, GERD management is nuanced and tailored based on patient factors and each physician's approach to diagnosis, which is unique to each region of the world. However, these diagnostic modalities alone are insufficient for a conclusive diagnosis and must be performed and interpreted within the clinical context, with the understanding that gray areas exist. A multipronged approach increases diagnostic confidence but also requires the insight of the treating physician in choosing the diagnostic and management approach appropriate for each part of the world, hence our heavy reliance on informed consensus opinions from regional thought leaders, which is what the Indian Consensus on GERD provides [1].
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.