The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.567752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of Frugal Behavior: The Influences of Consciousness for Sustainable Consumption, Materialism, and the Consideration of Future Consequences

Abstract: The transition toward sustainability and the adjustment to climate change should involve the reduction of consumption behavior and the need to maintain social practices of frugality. This paper investigates the influences of consciousness for sustainable consumption (CSC), materialism, and the consideration of future consequences (CFC) on frugal behaviors. Four-hundred-and-forty-four individuals responded to an instrument investigating these variables. Results of a structural model revealed that materialism si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The model as a whole, including the three consumer identities and environmental selfidentity, was able to predict a high amount of the variance of frugal behavior (47.9%). When analyzing the influence of the three consumer identities, it was the thrifty identity that had the strongest influence on frugal behavior (Hypothesis 1 is partially supported), highlighting the economic nature of this type of behavior, in line with previous evidence [15]. As expected, wasteful consumer identity had a negative influence on frugal behavior (Hypothesis 2 is supported); the more an individual identifies as a wasteful consumer, the less likely they are to engage in frugal consumption practices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model as a whole, including the three consumer identities and environmental selfidentity, was able to predict a high amount of the variance of frugal behavior (47.9%). When analyzing the influence of the three consumer identities, it was the thrifty identity that had the strongest influence on frugal behavior (Hypothesis 1 is partially supported), highlighting the economic nature of this type of behavior, in line with previous evidence [15]. As expected, wasteful consumer identity had a negative influence on frugal behavior (Hypothesis 2 is supported); the more an individual identifies as a wasteful consumer, the less likely they are to engage in frugal consumption practices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…A recent study exploring the influence of consciousness for sustainable consumption on frugal behavior found mixed results [15]. Consciousness was measured by three factors: (a) environmental consciousness, centered on the responsible awareness of environmentally friendly consumption; (b) social consciousness, focused on socially responsible and fair consumption; and (c) economic consciousness, anchored on the effort to consume in a manner that protects long-term economic well-being.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same vein, disseminating alternative normative messages oriented at reducing perceived competition based on material resources, and at increasing cooperation among low and middle classes for a general improvement in quality life, would contribute to building more cohesive and resilient societies. Messages promoting frugal behavior rather than materialism ( Suárez et al, 2020 ), for instance, could defuel the SA normative climate, as well as political movements based on shared identities among low and middle classes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El surgimiento de este concepto se presentó en la década de los sesenta para contrarrestar la visión del consumo normal, el cual puede ser entendido como la conciencia social de un individuo (Suárez et al, 2020) que tiene en cuenta las consecuencias públicas de su consumo privado como una construcción psicológica de participación social, donde, a través del poder adquisitivo, se pretende lograr un cambio en la sociedad, atendiendo su preocupación por los problemas sociales y ambientales (Lim et al, 2019), conocidos principalmente gracias a los movimientos medioambientalistas de la época (Webster, 1975).…”
Section: Consumo Responsableunclassified