2001
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.904983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of Financial Performance of Indian Corporate Sector in the Post-Liberalization Era: An Exploratory Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
42
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moon et al (2015) used Fama and French's (1993) three-factor and Carhart's (1997) four-factor models to examine the subsequent 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5-year stock returns of firms that stayed debt free for 3-and 5-year periods. Kakani et al (2001) studied 566 large Indian firms for eight years and divided into two sub-periods (viz., 1992-96, and 1996-2000) to examine the financial performance of Indian firms across various dimensions. The study found that leverage 'again' came out as having a significant negative effect on accounting profitability measures.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moon et al (2015) used Fama and French's (1993) three-factor and Carhart's (1997) four-factor models to examine the subsequent 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5-year stock returns of firms that stayed debt free for 3-and 5-year periods. Kakani et al (2001) studied 566 large Indian firms for eight years and divided into two sub-periods (viz., 1992-96, and 1996-2000) to examine the financial performance of Indian firms across various dimensions. The study found that leverage 'again' came out as having a significant negative effect on accounting profitability measures.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different measures have been used in different researches, which led to dissimilar findings. While on the other hand, some researchers from different countries (Ghana -Abor (2005); Sri Lanka - Nirajini and Priya (2013); Malaysia -San andHeng (2011) &Salim andYadav (2012); USA - Roden and Lewellen (1995); China -Huang (2006); India - Kakani et al (2001); etc. ), have used similar measures and still found contradicting results, which shows that location of trade for firms could bring about different results from those already found in other studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The empirical results documented a significant association between the firm's financial performance and firm specific indicators such as corporate governance, risk management, ownership structure, and capital structure. In another emerging market study, Kakani, Saha, and Reddy [19] analyzed the determinants of firm performance in the Indian market. The sample consisted of 566 large Indian firms and used data for two sub-periods, 1992-1996 and 1996-2000 to investigate Indian firms' financial performance.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newer and smaller firms, as a result, take away market share in spite of disadvantages like lack of capital, brand names and corporate reputation with older firms. (Kakani., Saha,, and Reddy, 2001) Regarding firm age, older firms are more experienced, have enjoyed the benefits of learning, are not prone to the liabilities of newness, and can, therefore, enjoy superior performance. Older firms may also benefit from reputation effects, which allow them to earn a higher margin on sales.…”
Section: D-company Agementioning
confidence: 99%