Abstract:Globally, nail salons represent a fast expanding industry and often with low-income cosmeticians. In general, cosmeticians have limited access to safety information about the hazardous materials they handle, which would potentially enable them to minimize workplace exposures. The problem is much pronounced in low- and middle-income countries due to weaknesses in regulation of the industry. We investigated determinants of exposures to hazardous materials among nail cosmeticians in Kampala District, Uganda. We e… Show more
“…A majority (70%) of the salon workers were knowledgeable about pathways through which any toxic substances in cosmetics and PCPs enter the body. This finding is consistent, in a general cosmetological context, with that of a study conducted in Uganda on nail cosmeticians [ 12 ], which showed that a majority of nail workers in Kampala City were knowledgeable about potential harms from hazardous materials contained in nail care products.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In terms of risks associated with occupational exposure to cosmetics and PCPs, a majority (88%) of the salon workers were aware that occupational exposure to cosmetics and PCPs can cause ill health. Previous studies that have reported comparably high levels of knowledge have attributed it to workplace training of salon workers [ 12 , 18 ]. In this study, the role of workplace training on knowledge of risks associated with occupational exposure to cosmetics and PCPs was not investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…attributed it to workplace training of salon workers [12,18]. In this study, the role of workplace training on knowledge of risks associated with occupational exposure to cosmetics and PCPs was not investigated.…”
Section: Plos Global Public Healthmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In spite of the occupational risks, salon workers lack formal protections and have limited opportunities for recourse. Yet across the globe, salon workers are often a vulnerable group because they are more likely to be immigrants [11], and people of low socio-economic and education status [11,12]. In the absence of formal protections, they tend to work under poor working conditions that expose them to ergonomic complications and both physical and psychological abuse [13][14][15], experiences that may exacerbate consequences of exposure to hazardous chemicals in cosmetics and PCPs.…”
Despite occupational exposure to hazardous chemicals in cosmetics and personal care products (PCPs), salon workers receive minimal formal protections. Consequently, most salon workers rely on personal safeguards. However, the nature of such individual-level safeguards remains unknown. Knowledge of risks associated with occupational use of cosmetics and PCPs and information needs of salon workers were investigated in Kisumu City, Kenya. Responses from 302 respondents showed that 84% were women and 30% had post-secondary education. Seventy percent reported knowing that ingestion, inhalation, dermal absorption, and injection are the pathways through which harmful products in cosmetics and PCPs may enter the body. Salon workers who had been employed for more than 5 years were at least twice more likely to report that it is not the case that cosmetics and PCPs only cause harm to children (5–10 years vs 1 year: OR = 2.440, 95% CI, 1.160–5.239; >10 years vs 1 year: OR = 8.857, 95% CI, 3.163–29.377); they were about three times more likely to either agree with the statement that cosmetics and PCPs only cause harm under prolonged exposure or to say that they did not know compared to their counterparts who had worked in the industry for 1 year (5–10 years vs 1 year: OR = 2.750, 95% CI, 1.144–7.179; >10 years vs 1 year: 3.179, 95% CI, 1.173–9.096). Over 50% of the respondents reported that they need information on how to protect themselves and others; on available protective measures; and on cosmetic products and PCPs that are safe. Sixty percent reported that they would prefer to get such information from the Ministry of Health at the county or national level and on product inserts. Overall, salon workers in Kisumu City are knowledgeable about the risks associated with their occupation but also appreciate gaps in their knowledge, which can be filled by government-mandated interventions.
“…A majority (70%) of the salon workers were knowledgeable about pathways through which any toxic substances in cosmetics and PCPs enter the body. This finding is consistent, in a general cosmetological context, with that of a study conducted in Uganda on nail cosmeticians [ 12 ], which showed that a majority of nail workers in Kampala City were knowledgeable about potential harms from hazardous materials contained in nail care products.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In terms of risks associated with occupational exposure to cosmetics and PCPs, a majority (88%) of the salon workers were aware that occupational exposure to cosmetics and PCPs can cause ill health. Previous studies that have reported comparably high levels of knowledge have attributed it to workplace training of salon workers [ 12 , 18 ]. In this study, the role of workplace training on knowledge of risks associated with occupational exposure to cosmetics and PCPs was not investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…attributed it to workplace training of salon workers [12,18]. In this study, the role of workplace training on knowledge of risks associated with occupational exposure to cosmetics and PCPs was not investigated.…”
Section: Plos Global Public Healthmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In spite of the occupational risks, salon workers lack formal protections and have limited opportunities for recourse. Yet across the globe, salon workers are often a vulnerable group because they are more likely to be immigrants [11], and people of low socio-economic and education status [11,12]. In the absence of formal protections, they tend to work under poor working conditions that expose them to ergonomic complications and both physical and psychological abuse [13][14][15], experiences that may exacerbate consequences of exposure to hazardous chemicals in cosmetics and PCPs.…”
Despite occupational exposure to hazardous chemicals in cosmetics and personal care products (PCPs), salon workers receive minimal formal protections. Consequently, most salon workers rely on personal safeguards. However, the nature of such individual-level safeguards remains unknown. Knowledge of risks associated with occupational use of cosmetics and PCPs and information needs of salon workers were investigated in Kisumu City, Kenya. Responses from 302 respondents showed that 84% were women and 30% had post-secondary education. Seventy percent reported knowing that ingestion, inhalation, dermal absorption, and injection are the pathways through which harmful products in cosmetics and PCPs may enter the body. Salon workers who had been employed for more than 5 years were at least twice more likely to report that it is not the case that cosmetics and PCPs only cause harm to children (5–10 years vs 1 year: OR = 2.440, 95% CI, 1.160–5.239; >10 years vs 1 year: OR = 8.857, 95% CI, 3.163–29.377); they were about three times more likely to either agree with the statement that cosmetics and PCPs only cause harm under prolonged exposure or to say that they did not know compared to their counterparts who had worked in the industry for 1 year (5–10 years vs 1 year: OR = 2.750, 95% CI, 1.144–7.179; >10 years vs 1 year: 3.179, 95% CI, 1.173–9.096). Over 50% of the respondents reported that they need information on how to protect themselves and others; on available protective measures; and on cosmetic products and PCPs that are safe. Sixty percent reported that they would prefer to get such information from the Ministry of Health at the county or national level and on product inserts. Overall, salon workers in Kisumu City are knowledgeable about the risks associated with their occupation but also appreciate gaps in their knowledge, which can be filled by government-mandated interventions.
“…The informal sector salons and technicians, however, procure products that are readily available and affordable, and which might contain banned and unsafe chemicals. This practice was reported in a study in Uganda where nail salons used cheap cosmetics to keep costs low (23).…”
Nail technicians are exposed to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from nail products used in their daily work, which may cause adverse health effects. This study aimed to assess VOC exposure of nail technicians in the South African formal and informal sectors and to provide a task-based exposure assessment of different nail applications. Personal passive sampling was conducted on 10 formal and 10 informal nail technicians located in the northern suburbs of Johannesburg and the Braamfontein area, over 3 days. Real-time measurements were taken to determine task-based peak exposures. The number of clients serviced, working hours, type of nail application, type of ventilation, room volume, and carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations, were also recorded. There were differences in the nail products used, the types of nail applications performed, the number of clients serviced, and breathing zones VOC concentrations of the formal and informal nail technicians. Some formal nail salons were equipped with mechanical ventilation while the informal nail salons relied on natural ventilation. CO2 concentrations were higher in the informal than the formal nail salons and increased during the course of the working day. Formal nail technicians were exposed to higher total volatile organic compounds (TVOC) concentrations than informal nail technicians, which may be due to the different nail application procedures as well as ‘background’ emissions from their co-workers—the bystander effect. Acetone was the predominantly detected VOC: the formal nail technicians were exposed to significantly higher TWA (8 h) concentrations [geometric mean (GM) 43.8 ppm, geometric standard deviation (GSD) 2.49] than were the informal nail technicians (GM 9.87 ppm, GSD 5.13). Methyl methacrylate among the informal nail technicians was measured at 89.7% detection frequency, far higher than that among the formal nail technicians (3.4%). This may be attributed to the observed popularity of acrylic nail applications in this sector. Nail applications involving soak-off gave rise to high TVOC peaks at the start of the nail application process. This is the first study to compare organic solvent exposures among formal and informal nail technicians and determine task-based peak exposures. It also brings attention to the often-overlooked informal sector of this industry.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.