2017
DOI: 10.12735/jfe.v5n1p09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of Credit Default Swap Spreads: A Four-Market Panel Data Analysis

Abstract: This paper attempts to elucidate whether firm performance and macroeconomic conditions play a significant role in explaining credit default swap (CDS) spreads. Our panel dataset covers 112 reference entities in four markets (South Korea, Hong Kong, France, and Germany) for the period 2001-12. Overall, our results suggest that market value indicators (Tobin's Q, stock market returns, and the interest rate) appear to be more important than book value indicators (i.e., ROA, ROE, and the GDP growth rate) in determ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Li and Fu (2017) have found that market value indicators (Tobin’s q, stock market returns and the interest rate) appear to be more important than book value indicators (i.e., ROA, ROE) as CDS spread determinants. Their observations deal with both two European countries (i.e., Germany and France) and two Asian ones (namely South Korea and Hong Kong).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Li and Fu (2017) have found that market value indicators (Tobin’s q, stock market returns and the interest rate) appear to be more important than book value indicators (i.e., ROA, ROE) as CDS spread determinants. Their observations deal with both two European countries (i.e., Germany and France) and two Asian ones (namely South Korea and Hong Kong).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They find that the derivative is more sensitive to market risk factors, while the impact of capital adequacy, earnings and liquidity indicators is weaker. Analogously Li and Fu (2017), find that market value indicators (namely, Tobin's Q, stock market returns and interest rate) appear to be more important than book value indicators, as CDS determinants. Similar findings are shown by Samaniego-Medina et al (2016), who show great explanatory power for market variables in terms of market equity return and volatility, whereas, as concerns accounting variables, they find significance for the non-performing loan ratio, the capitalisation ratio and liquidity proxies.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 75%