Determinants of carbon management accounting adoption in Ghanaian firms

Abstract

Purpose Carbon management accounting (CMA) is one part of sustainability accounting designed to provide information for the management of carbon dioxide (CO2) releases. Adopting the contingency framework, this paper aims to examine the contextual antecedents that influence CMA adoption in Ghanaian firms. Design/methodology/approach The paper tests seven contextual dimensions, namely, strategy, structure, size, environmental management system (EMS), decentralization, technology and perceived environmental uncertainty, on CMA adoption from a survey of 125 accountants. Findings Consistent with prior literature, organizational strategy, structure, environmental management accounting (EMA), firm size, technology and perceived environmental uncertainty were found to be positively associated with CMA adoption and hence support contingency theory. However, a relationship between decentralization and EMA adoption was not supported by the sample data. Also, the existence of CMA systems was found to be low in the sample firms, although more than half of the respondents have EMS. Research limitations/implications The study is limited to Ghana hence possible generalization of the results is limited. Further exploration of contingency-based research in other emerging economies would provide valuable insights on CMA adoption and practices to contribute to the CMA literature. Practical implications The findings suggest that although CMA adoption and practices is low in the sampled firms, both contextual and environmental factors play a vital role in the adoption of CMA in developing economies, as it pertains to the generic management accounting systems. Policies governing CMA practice should incorporate organizational contextual factors. Originality/value The paper presents preliminary empirical evidence on the state of adoption and practice of CMA from an emerging economy perspective, an area which lacks empirical investigation both in the EMA and the carbon accounting domain. It draws considerable novelty on the basis that despite the growing interest in climate change-based research empirical works on CO2 emissions conducted exclusively from management accounting perspective, and in developing economies in particular, have been scant. The paper extends the contingency theory framework from conventional practices to the EMA field.

Carbon management accounting and financial performance: Evidence from the European Union emission trading system

“…In this way, CMA has evolved as a tool to help companies make better decisions about carbon issues (Tsai et al, 2012). According to a company's operations, measurements of carbon emissions are communicated through CMA internally and externally (Nartey, 2017). From the social/environmental level, it relates internally to CM and external dissemination thereof, as well as to the way organizations manage their products and supply chains, offering information about it (Ascui, 2014).…”

Analysing the environmental websites of the world’s greatest polluters: a multimodal ecolinguistic approach

“…A number of factors have been found to influence a company's readiness to be publicly engaged with climate change. Among them, size (C ordova et al, 2018;Eleftheriadis & Anagnostopoulou, 2015;Nartey, 2018;S anchez-Infante Hern andez et al, 2020), internal organisation systems (C ordova et al, 2018;Nartey, 2018;Rankin et al, 2011), international presence (Halkos & Skouloudis, 2016), the sector in which the companies operate (Weder et al, 2019), and external pressure (Haque & Islam, 2015;Littlewood et al, 2018), including media exposure (Wang et al, 2013) and extraordinary natural disasters (Pollach, 2018). Research also suggests that those companies and countries which implement environmental issues in their everyday practices, through patents or industrial and economic activity, tend to be more successful in terms of competitive advantages, economic growth and innovation (Ferreira et al, 2020;Mohammadi et al, 2018;Singh et al, 2019;Skare & Golja, 2012).…”

The Influence of Carbon Management on the Financial Performance of European Companies

“…CMA are affected by internal and contextual (external) factors since they were designed and used by organizations. In a way, these constitute quantitative records of a particular unit established according to the company's operations and communicated within and beyond the company [26].…”