Determinants of Actual Purchase Behavior in Farmers’ Markets

Abstract

Farmers’ markets in Taiwan advocate for the sustainable consumption of locally produced food to support sustainability and social justice goals. Institutional trust and interpersonal trust are critical determinative factors in sustaining farmers’ farm-to-consumer venues for the long-run. The purpose of this research was to investigate determinants of customers’ actual purchase behaviors, and the relationships between trust, purchase intention, and actual purchase behavior in the context of farmers’ markets. A questionnaire approach with closed-ended survey questions was conducted with customers in farmers’ markets in different parts of Taiwan. The results revealed that both institutional and interpersonal trust could serve as driving forces influencing a consumer’s purchase intentions, which in turn reinforces their actual purchase behavior. Specifically, the interpersonal trust between consumers and producers includes positive interactions and sufficient communication, enabling producers to share the value and concepts underlying their production processes with the consumers, enhancing customers’ purchase intentions and intensity. Institutional trust generated from a producer’s endeavor to improve the quality of their own products by meeting market standards would impress consumers and build loyalty. It is recommended that farmers’ market farmers or managers continually examine both the institutional and interpersonal needs of customers (e.g., food safety, face-to-face interactions between farmers and consumers) to earn customers’ trust, and to accommodate their expectations by providing sufficient products and services.

Profiling the consumers of farmers' markets: a systematic review of survey-based empirical evidence

“…This does not mean exclusive, one-way information sharing (from seller to buyer) but reciprocity between buyer and seller. FMs support direct interaction between producers and final consumers, which allows for greater information exchange (Fehrenbach and Wharton, 2014; Spilková, Fendrychová and Syrovátková, 2013; Tsai et al, 2019), encouraged by a friendly atmosphere (Pitts et al, 2015) that is typical of FMs. More informed consumers are more liable to buy at FMs (Bir et al, 2019).…”

Sensory, cognitive perception, and consumer liking of Mexican Persian lime (Citrus latifolia Tanaka): an online survey with pictures comparing consumer types and sale contexts

“…The main contribution and limitation of this research is focused on the sensory and cognitive perception of different types of consumers (housewives, CC, and producers) of Mexican Persian lime in different sale contexts. Due to the importance and potential of the Mexican Persian lime, future research with this citrus must be focused on the study and verification of hypotheses about the relationships between sensory, cognitive, socioeconomic aspects, trust in the product, and sustainable determinants in order to have a more robust view of consumer purchase intention (Tsai et al ., 2019; Peralta‐Cruz et al ., 2021; Bai et al ., 2023).…”

Relational goods and direct purchase from farmers: estimating the value of the relationship between consumers and producers

“…Some authors investigated the role of interpersonal trust, analysing the building and the implication of trusting relations, e.g. on purchase intentions or actual purchase behaviour (Moore, 2006;Tsai et al, 2019). Others analysed the sharing of information during direct consumer/farmer interaction able to lead to transformative learning and willingness to change behaviour both on the consumption side (Carson et al, 2016;Pascucci et al, 2011) and on the production side (Hunt, 2007).…”