2016
DOI: 10.3856/vol44-issue2-fulltext-24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinacion del voltaje y el tamano del animal optimos para la extraccion de espermatoforos en el camaron de agua dulce Macrobrachium acanthurus

Abstract: RESUMEN.Hasta el momento los estudios sobre reproducción en Macrobrachium acanthurus están poco avanzados siendo importantes si se prevé la posibilidad de su cultivo. El objetivo de este trabajo fue identificar el voltaje más adecuado para la extracción de los espermatóforos y la menor talla con que estos langostinos los producen, como paso previo a desarrollar técnicas de fecundación in vitro. Se utilizaron voltajes de 4,5 y 6,0 voltios, realizándose el conteo de los espermatozoides en base a la supervivencia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, spermatophore turnover of Penaeus setiferus (Linnaeus, 1767), Penaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) and Penaeus stylirostris (Stimpson, 1871) occurs cyclically approximately every 15 days (Alfaro‐Montoya, ) and giant river prawn, M. rosenbergii, has a mean inter‐spermatophore production period that is considerably shorter (1–2 days) than that of M. americanum . This long inter‐spermatophore period can be explained because the M. americanum spermatophore is approximately five times heavier (10 mg, range = 3–47 mg) than the spermatophore of M. rosenbergii (2 mg) (Harris & Sandifer, ) and is almost ten times heavier than the spermatophore of Macrobrachium acanthurus (Wiegmann, 1836) (0.84 ± 0.47 mg), having an inter‐spermatophore period of 15 days (Viana da Costa et al, ).The decrease in spermatophore production (PSP%) observed during the present study implies a time limit for which M. americanum males can be used as broodstock prawns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, spermatophore turnover of Penaeus setiferus (Linnaeus, 1767), Penaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) and Penaeus stylirostris (Stimpson, 1871) occurs cyclically approximately every 15 days (Alfaro‐Montoya, ) and giant river prawn, M. rosenbergii, has a mean inter‐spermatophore production period that is considerably shorter (1–2 days) than that of M. americanum . This long inter‐spermatophore period can be explained because the M. americanum spermatophore is approximately five times heavier (10 mg, range = 3–47 mg) than the spermatophore of M. rosenbergii (2 mg) (Harris & Sandifer, ) and is almost ten times heavier than the spermatophore of Macrobrachium acanthurus (Wiegmann, 1836) (0.84 ± 0.47 mg), having an inter‐spermatophore period of 15 days (Viana da Costa et al, ).The decrease in spermatophore production (PSP%) observed during the present study implies a time limit for which M. americanum males can be used as broodstock prawns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spermatophores of M. americanum from the present study were extracted on average every 24 days (range 20–28 days) using an electro‐stimulation method with a 9 V battery (Sandifer et al, ). The sperm count and the record of the proportions of live/dead and normal/abnormal sperm morphology estimations were made by macerating the spermatophores in 0.5 ml of distilled water and staining the river prawn sperm with eosin‐nigrosin in 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes (Viana da Costa et al, ). The sperm count was assessed using a Neubauer camera and observed with an optical microscope at 10, 20, 40 and 100× magnification (Leung‐Trujillo & Lawrence, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Methods for evaluating sperm quality consist of determining the morphology, counting the number of sperm cells with the aid of optical microscopy, and the weight and regeneration of spermatophores (Coman et al, 2007;Leelatanawit et al, 2014;Harlıoğlu and Farhadi, 2017). The most widespread technique for spermatophore extraction in decapods is electrostimulation, since it is fast and can provide complete expulsions (Goldberg and Oshiro, 2000;Viana da Costa et al, 2016). This technique was first used in M. rosenbergii (see Harris and Sandifer, 1986), however, the use of electrostimulation may be a limiting factor for subsequent sperm extractions (Baskar et al, 2004), since there is evidence that it causes melanization of reproductive tissue (Harris and Sandifer, 1986).…”
Section: Sperm Viability Of Macrobrachium Tenellummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were carefully macerated using a glass tissue grinder to obtain complete release and homogenization of the sperm cells. Later, spermatic counts were performed using a Neubauer chamber (AmScope, model B020c, Irvine, CA, USA) (Viana da Costa et al, 2016). The percentage of dead sperm cells was determined through staining cells with Trypan blue (solution 0.1 %) (Ceballos-Vázquez et al, 2003).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Sperm Viabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%