2015
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deterioration Modeling of Steel Moment Resisting Frames Using Finite-Length Plastic Hinge Force-Based Beam-Column Elements

Abstract: A note on versions:The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.For more information, please contact eprints@nottingham.ac.uk The use of empirically calibrated moment-rotation models that account for strength and stiffness 6 deterioration of steel fra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both models, columns are modeled using nonlinear force‐based fiber‐section beam‐column elements in which an elasto‐plastic constitutive law with a 3% kinematic hardening is assigned to each fiber. Beams are modeled using a force‐based finite length plastic‐hinge beam‐column element , which models plastic hinge length explicitly and separates the behavior of beam in the span from that of beam‐column connections. Both models use the modified Gauss–Radau integration scheme.…”
Section: Building Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In both models, columns are modeled using nonlinear force‐based fiber‐section beam‐column elements in which an elasto‐plastic constitutive law with a 3% kinematic hardening is assigned to each fiber. Beams are modeled using a force‐based finite length plastic‐hinge beam‐column element , which models plastic hinge length explicitly and separates the behavior of beam in the span from that of beam‐column connections. Both models use the modified Gauss–Radau integration scheme.…”
Section: Building Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a finite‐length plastic‐hinge element is used, a plastic hinge length of L p = L /6(where L is the beam span) should be used to recover the exact solution for the case of a fixed–fixed beam column element . Otherwise, a plastic‐hinge calibration approach is warranted for recovery of the elastic and inelastic stiffness . All other model parameters are defined as proposed by Lignos and Krawinkler .…”
Section: Building Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beams are modeled using (1) Finite-Length Plastic Hinge (FLPH) elements [Scott and Fenves (2006); Ribeiro, Barbosa, Scott et al (2015)] for simulating beam nonlinear response, including strength and stiffness deterioration of the beams, and (2) zero-length springs to simulate the nonlinear behavior of connections. Columns are modeled using force-based fiber-section distributed plasticity finite elements, a common assumption as the SAC buildings have rather stocky columns.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plastic hinge length was selected as 1/6 of beam length such that no correction of moment of inertia (for the elastic portion of the beam element) is required for this special case (Ribeiro 2015). ASCE 41 modeling parameters for welded unreinforced flange (WUF) beam-to-column connections are used as default input to simulate the connection behavior.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beams are modeled using force-based nonlinear beamcolumn elements with finite-length plastic hinges at both ends as proposed by Ribeiro et al (Ribeiro 2015), and the hysteresis uniaxial material in OpenSees is used to model the moment-curvature behavior of plastic hinge locations and used with the fatigue material wrapper to account for low cycle fatigue. Plastic hinge length was selected as 1/6 of beam length such that no correction of moment of inertia (for the elastic portion of the beam element) is required for this special case (Ribeiro 2015).…”
Section: Mathematical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%