2019
DOI: 10.32604/cmes.2019.06296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fragility Assessment of Pre-Northridge Steel Moment Frames Using Finite-Length Plastic Hinge Elements and Concentrated Plasticity Fracture Elements

Abstract: Although pre-Northridge earthquake steel moment resisting frame buildings have been shown to be susceptible to brittle connection failures, they still represent a large fraction of the existing steel buildings in the United States of America. In this study, the performance of the 3-and 9-story Los Angeles pre-Northridge SAC buildings are analyzed considering ductile and brittle beam-column connection failures, and their uncertainty. This paper contributes to understanding the influence of uncertainty associate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In performance-based design, the trustworthiness of the structural design relies on the fidelity of the numerical model. [15][16][17][18][19][20] Many performance assessment methodologies, such as FEMA P-695 21 and FEMA P-58, 22 consider modeling uncertainty by categorizing the fidelity of the numerical model and adjusting the fragility function accordingly. However, the seismic demands estimated for the structural and nonstructural components can be affected by the use of a unique numerical model that does not directly account for modeling uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In performance-based design, the trustworthiness of the structural design relies on the fidelity of the numerical model. [15][16][17][18][19][20] Many performance assessment methodologies, such as FEMA P-695 21 and FEMA P-58, 22 consider modeling uncertainty by categorizing the fidelity of the numerical model and adjusting the fragility function accordingly. However, the seismic demands estimated for the structural and nonstructural components can be affected by the use of a unique numerical model that does not directly account for modeling uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If not codified, new lateral‐force resisting systems are subject to designs using alternative methods, 14 which are often based on performance‐based design philosophies. In performance‐based design, the trustworthiness of the structural design relies on the fidelity of the numerical model 15–20 . Many performance assessment methodologies, such as FEMA P‐695 21 and FEMA P‐58, 22 consider modeling uncertainty by categorizing the fidelity of the numerical model and adjusting the fragility function accordingly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This extended PBEE framework could be used to develop, calibrate and validate simplified probabilistic performance-based design procedures. Ribeiro et al [Ribeiro, Barbosa and Neves (2019)] studied the probabilistic performance of the 3-and 9-story pre-Northridge SAC buildings in Los Angeles considering ductile and brittle beam-column connection failures. This study investigated, using OpenSees, the influence of the uncertainty associated with connections brittle fracture on building interstory deformation capacity, as well as its impact on the bias and variability of fragility functions and loss assessment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%