2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2020.104845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of undeclared bovine milk in different food matrices by a multi-technique approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Applications of PCR were used to investigate the adulteration of goat milk produced by smallholders with bovine milk as an adulterant 23 . Several studies have confirmed the potential of DNA-based methods for detecting the fraudulent admixture of milk from different species in milk and milk products 24 , 25 . Nevertheless, each sample must undergo complex and time-consuming preparation procedures, such as DNA isolation and quantification, and the design of species-specific primers 26 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Applications of PCR were used to investigate the adulteration of goat milk produced by smallholders with bovine milk as an adulterant 23 . Several studies have confirmed the potential of DNA-based methods for detecting the fraudulent admixture of milk from different species in milk and milk products 24 , 25 . Nevertheless, each sample must undergo complex and time-consuming preparation procedures, such as DNA isolation and quantification, and the design of species-specific primers 26 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The procedure of DNA authentication assumes the possibility of detecting partial substitution of the declared type of milk by molecular genetic analysis of unique gene loci (Agrimonti and Marmiroli, 2018;Kalogianni, 2018;Agrimonti et al, 2019). The most common method for species identification in milk and dairy products is PCR followed by electrophoresis and hybridization-fluorescence detection of amplification products (Choopan et al, 2017;Di Domenico et al, 2017;Cosenza et al, 2019;Tsakali et al, 2019;Di Febo et al, 2020;Tsirigoti et al, 2020). Additional authentication approaches based on the length polymorphism of restriction fragments of amplified DNA (PCR-RFLP) have also found their application along with methods of hybridization, sequence, and biosensor analysis of the corresponding nucleotide sequences of mitochondrial and nuclear genes (Abdel-Rahman and Ahmed, 2007;Tillmar et al, 2013;Ripp et al, 2014;Abdelfatah et al, 2015;Beltramo et al, 2017;Kounelli and Kalogianni, Species identification of ruminant milk by genotyping of the κ-casein gene R. R. Vafin, 1 A. G. Galstyan, 2 S. V. Tyulkin, 1 Kh.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cited EU reference analytical methodology No. 273/2008 has several limitations: it is not a high-throughput method, provides only semiquantitative results [16,[33][34][35], and the analysis is time-consuming. Moreover, the method cannot discriminate goat-sheep mixtures [36] and the overlapping of species-specific bands generates complex protein profiles, thus, impairing the interpretation of results [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunological methods (mainly ELISA) are quite used in the determination of cow's milk in declared sheep, goat, or buffalo products [33,[44][45][46][47][48][49]. The main difficulty lies in the production of antibodies exclusively specific for milk proteins from one species, even if some commercial kits are available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%