2015
DOI: 10.5578/mb.8839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of the First QnrS Gene Positivity in Aquatic Aeromonas spp. Isolates in Turkey

Abstract: ÖZSularda yaygın olarak bulunan Aeromonas türleri, gram-negatif, oksidaz pozitif, fakültatif anaerop bakteriler olup, A.hydrophila, A.sobria ve A.bestiarum türleri hem insanlarda hem de soğukkanlı hayvanlarda ciddi enfeksiyonlara neden olmaktadır. Tıp ve veterinerlik alanında yaygın olarak kullanılan kinolonların çevresel ortamlarda değişmeden kalabilme özelliği, dirençli mutantların seçiminde önemli rol oynamaktadır. Plazmid aracılı direnç, kinolonlara karşı direncin gelişiminde etkin olan mekanizmalardan bir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Today, while most mesophilic bacteria are registered in the databases of these identification systems and are regularly updated, there is still no comprehensive database available for fish pathogens (www.biomerieux-diagnostics.com; www.bd.com). Among the identification test kits most commonly used for aquatic pathogens, the API 20E test system, although initially having been designed for enteric pathogens, can be also used for the identification of non-enteric Aeromonas species (Onuk et al 2015;Stratev and Odeyemi 2016;El-Son et al 2019). There are many reports of low success rates for rapid diagnostic systems in determining aquatic pathogens, thus indicating the unfeasibility of these systems for such use (Santos et al 1993;Jin et al 2011;Janda 2014;Popović et al 2017;Jung-Schroers et al 2018).…”
Section: Colorimetric Methods By Automated Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Today, while most mesophilic bacteria are registered in the databases of these identification systems and are regularly updated, there is still no comprehensive database available for fish pathogens (www.biomerieux-diagnostics.com; www.bd.com). Among the identification test kits most commonly used for aquatic pathogens, the API 20E test system, although initially having been designed for enteric pathogens, can be also used for the identification of non-enteric Aeromonas species (Onuk et al 2015;Stratev and Odeyemi 2016;El-Son et al 2019). There are many reports of low success rates for rapid diagnostic systems in determining aquatic pathogens, thus indicating the unfeasibility of these systems for such use (Santos et al 1993;Jin et al 2011;Janda 2014;Popović et al 2017;Jung-Schroers et al 2018).…”
Section: Colorimetric Methods By Automated Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the identification test kits most commonly used for aquatic pathogens, the API 20E test system, although initially having been designed for enteric pathogens, can be also used for the identification of non‐enteric Aeromonas species (Onuk et al. 2015; Stratev and Odeyemi 2016; El‐Son et al. 2019).…”
Section: Phenotypic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scientific studies indicate that several diseases were affecting wild fish populations before the aquaculture industry existed (Olivier, 2012). The studies related to fish diseases such as pseudomoniasis,pasteurellosis, motile Aeromonas septicemia and lactococcosis generally focused on the reared fish species in Turkey (Korun & Timur, 2005;Onuk et al 2015;Ture & Alp, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%