2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2020.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of target-site and metabolic resistance to pyrethroids in the bed bug Cimex lectularius in Berlin, Germany

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While in another study fenitrothion and imidacloprid resistance showed an association between cuticle thickness and resistance. but, the association may be tenuous because the resistance mechanism is multifactorial in C. hemipterus , and these mechanisms, in the C. hemipterus population were, caused by both M 918I and L1014F mutations, which is likely related to cuticle thickness ( 15 ), as well as, in bed bugs populations, there are multiple resistance mechanisms against pyrethroids, that seem caused by several point mutations in the voltage-sensitive sodium channel α-subunit gene and increased metabolic detoxification by cytochrome P450, all contributing to knockdown resistance (kdr)( 16 , 17 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in another study fenitrothion and imidacloprid resistance showed an association between cuticle thickness and resistance. but, the association may be tenuous because the resistance mechanism is multifactorial in C. hemipterus , and these mechanisms, in the C. hemipterus population were, caused by both M 918I and L1014F mutations, which is likely related to cuticle thickness ( 15 ), as well as, in bed bugs populations, there are multiple resistance mechanisms against pyrethroids, that seem caused by several point mutations in the voltage-sensitive sodium channel α-subunit gene and increased metabolic detoxification by cytochrome P450, all contributing to knockdown resistance (kdr)( 16 , 17 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%