2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.infrared.2020.103334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of surface defects on solar cells by fusing Multi-channel convolution neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Or we explicitly train a Fully Convolutional Network to perform pixel-wise classification [ 29 ]. Additionally, other researchers have also proposed other types of defect location, using bounding boxes [ 30 , 31 ], or by visualizing the activation maps from the last network layer [ 25 , 32 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Or we explicitly train a Fully Convolutional Network to perform pixel-wise classification [ 29 ]. Additionally, other researchers have also proposed other types of defect location, using bounding boxes [ 30 , 31 ], or by visualizing the activation maps from the last network layer [ 25 , 32 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combined usage of short-and long-term deep features enables effective detection of various micro-cracks. Zhang et al [11] proposed a solar cell surface defect detection method based on a model that fuses the Faster R-CNN and the R-FCN. They improved the detection accuracy through the complementary fusion of detection results of the Faster R-CNN and R-FCN models.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13], a public dataset of solar cells is provided that contains 2,624 solar cell images and two approaches are proposed to classify the EL images. In [14], a fusion model of Faster R-CNN and R-FCN is proposed to detect solar cell surface defects. In [15], an efficient method for defects inspection has been proposed that leverages the multi-attention network and the hybrid loss to improve the performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details of the previous work [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] are presented in Table 1. The limitations of these solutions can be summarized as follows: (1) Most images used in the previous studies are collected during the factory inspection and the resolution of the images captured during the factory inspection is generally much higher than those collected during the field inspection using the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%