Detection of Prostate Cancer and Changes in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Six Months after Surgery for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Patients with Elevated PSA
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate early postoperative results of patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels who underwent surgery due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Patients and Methods: 64 patients who had lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), normal digital rectal examinations (DRE), elevated PSA levels and prostate biopsies reported as being benign pathologically in specimens obtained by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies, were included in the study. Patients were assessed in accor… Show more
“…This is comparable with the results (11%) reported by Boddy et al It is interesting that the PSA rise in the first 6 months after operation was generally induced by the inflammatory process: carcinoma was found in only 1 of 6 patients who underwent biopsies during this period. These data are very similar to those reported by Ozden et al [23]. It must be also emphasized that 37% of our patients were actively requested to come back for follow-up visits.…”
The detection rate of clinically significant cancer on preoperative biopsies postoperative pathologic exam in patients with AUR and indwelling catheter is low. These patients could be safely operated on without any delay. However, in order to detect clinically important cancer in the peripheral zone a postoperative monitoring period of should be recommended: starting 6 months after operation and continuing subsequently for at least 4 years. Postoperative PSA level is the strongest predictor of cancer detection and could be usefully employed in these patients. AUR and in the patients with large prostate cause elevated PSA. Cancer detection rate on preoperative biopsies is low in these patients. Long postoperative monitoring period should be strongly recommended.
“…This is comparable with the results (11%) reported by Boddy et al It is interesting that the PSA rise in the first 6 months after operation was generally induced by the inflammatory process: carcinoma was found in only 1 of 6 patients who underwent biopsies during this period. These data are very similar to those reported by Ozden et al [23]. It must be also emphasized that 37% of our patients were actively requested to come back for follow-up visits.…”
The detection rate of clinically significant cancer on preoperative biopsies postoperative pathologic exam in patients with AUR and indwelling catheter is low. These patients could be safely operated on without any delay. However, in order to detect clinically important cancer in the peripheral zone a postoperative monitoring period of should be recommended: starting 6 months after operation and continuing subsequently for at least 4 years. Postoperative PSA level is the strongest predictor of cancer detection and could be usefully employed in these patients. AUR and in the patients with large prostate cause elevated PSA. Cancer detection rate on preoperative biopsies is low in these patients. Long postoperative monitoring period should be strongly recommended.
“…This is in agreement with our experience with an 85.5% reduction in PSA with a mean tissue weight of 118 G in our combined HoLEP and upper tract stone procedure cohort. PSA reductions of 85.5% to 91.7% for HoLEP [16,36] compare favorably with decreases of 71.3% to 95.6% for open prostatectomy [45][46][47] and of 69.7% to 83.5% for TURP [45][46][47][48]. These large decreases in PSA objectively corroborate our impression that HoLEP provides a thorough resection of prostatic tissue and that the amount of reduction in PSA appears to be an excellent surrogate measurement of adenomatous tissue removal.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…HoLEP offers significant advantages over TURP and open prostatectomy and should be considered as primary therapy for every patient requiring surgical therapy for BPH. [36] HoLEP (10) 85.5 6.2 0.9 118 6 Ozden et al [47] Open/TURP (32) 74.2 14.8 3.7 N/A 6 Marks et al [45] Open/TURP (82) 71.3 4.6 0.7 35 6 Aus et al [48] TURP (190) 69.7 6 1.9 33.5 3 Stamey et al [46] Open (7) 95. 6 24.1 1 88.9 N/A Stamey et al [46] TURP (73) 83.5 7.9 1.3 29 N/A Hai and Malek [49] KTP (10) 42.4 3.3 1.9 11.1 12 BPH-benign prostatic hyperplasia; HoLEP-holmium laser enucleation of the prostate; KTP-potassium titanyl phosphate; PSA-prostate-specific antigen; TURP-transurethral resection of the prostate.…”
“…Prostate volume and symptomatic prostatic inflammation are the two most important factors contributing to the elevated PSA levels in men without clinically detectable PC [13]. Recently, studies have shown that asymptomatic prostatitis can elevate the PSA significantly [14][15][16][17]. In this study, the relationship between asymptomatic prostate inflammation and PSA elevation was not assessed.…”
Using the changes in PSA-related parameters after antibacterial therapy DeltaPSA, DeltaPSAD, and Deltaf/t PSA improve the PC detection rate and decrease unnecessary prostate biopsies in patients with asymptomatic prostatitis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.