2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-6851(01)00379-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasites in vivo by real-time quantitative PCR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
197
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
197
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A P. falciparum-specific 18S ribosomal DNA RT-PCR was performed on a CFX96™ real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) and a FAM-labeled Taqman probe as described. 16,19,20 If there were discordant results in duplicate samples (i.e., one positive result and one negative result), the RT-PCR for that sample was repeated. Results were not considered positive until they gave a signal in at least two of the duplicate samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A P. falciparum-specific 18S ribosomal DNA RT-PCR was performed on a CFX96™ real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) and a FAM-labeled Taqman probe as described. 16,19,20 If there were discordant results in duplicate samples (i.e., one positive result and one negative result), the RT-PCR for that sample was repeated. Results were not considered positive until they gave a signal in at least two of the duplicate samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although molecular diagnostic assays that varied somewhat in protocol had been previously performed on samples for detection of Pf infection, the assays were repeated using the same molecular diagnostic test on samples performed at the same time to assure consistency. 12,15,18 Rather than repeating an assay on all samples from this cohort, approximately one-half of the available samples were examined for all species of malaria using the described protocol (PCR-LDR). Concordance for Pf infection comparing results obtained in both assays (real-time quantitative PCR [RTQ-PCR] and PCR-LDR) was approximately 86% (data not shown).…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is becoming clear that innate responses can differ between individuals (25,36) with potential clinical implications. To date, only two-rather small-studies have exploited the unique opportunity offered by experimental infection of malaria-naive volunteers (during the evaluation of antimalarial vaccines) to study the very early stages of the immune response to malaria (37,38), and it has been difficult to draw any generalizable conclusions from them. Here, we present a detailed longitudinal analysis of 11 different cytokine responses in 18 experimentally infected individuals, using a highly sensitive, bead-based multiplex assay, and we compare these responses with peripheral parasite densities, as measured by quantitative real-time PCR (39).…”
Section: R Esearch On the Immunology Of Malaria Infection Has Beenmentioning
confidence: 99%