2016
DOI: 10.15406/jdvar.2016.03.00071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Multidrug Resistance Genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from Bovine Mastitic Milk

Abstract: A total of 270 milk samples were collected from private and governmental cow`s farms (200 samples from mastitic cows and 70 from apparently healthy cows). The samples were collected from different provinces (130 samples from Dakahlia, 66 samples from Sharkia and 74 samples from Damieta). Twenty isolates of P. Aeruginosa were isolated from 270 total milk samples in a percentage of 7.4. Damietta providence showed high percentage P. Aeruginosa isolates 8.1% followed by Sharkia providence and Dakhlia providence (7… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
(31 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mastitis is considered the most common serious health problem on dairy farms which lead to significant bio health hazard to human particularly in developing countries such as in Egypt (Ammar et al, 2016). Clinical inspection and the California mastitis test were found to be effective diagnostic tools for detecting and distinguishing clinical and subclinical mastitis from apparently healthy cattle, which is consistent with previous findings (Gianneechini et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Mastitis is considered the most common serious health problem on dairy farms which lead to significant bio health hazard to human particularly in developing countries such as in Egypt (Ammar et al, 2016). Clinical inspection and the California mastitis test were found to be effective diagnostic tools for detecting and distinguishing clinical and subclinical mastitis from apparently healthy cattle, which is consistent with previous findings (Gianneechini et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%