2010
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.100492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Lumbar Facet Joint Gouty Arthritis Using Dual-energy Computed Tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, gout can affect joint areas which were not part of our study, or were only represented in very low numbers, such as the spine, the shoulders and the elbows. 16 Therefore, the performance of DECT for these joint areas is unclear and images should be interpreted with caution. Interestingly, in several patients with an unremarkable SF analysis, DECT did demonstrate evidence of MSU deposition in tendon sheaths and entheseal sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, gout can affect joint areas which were not part of our study, or were only represented in very low numbers, such as the spine, the shoulders and the elbows. 16 Therefore, the performance of DECT for these joint areas is unclear and images should be interpreted with caution. Interestingly, in several patients with an unremarkable SF analysis, DECT did demonstrate evidence of MSU deposition in tendon sheaths and entheseal sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DECT can differentiate different materials based on their relative absorption of X-rays at different photon energy levels (25,27). There are currently a few promising cases of using DECT in the work up of spinal gout patients (26,28,29). In the absence of DECT, Hou et al presents an algorithm that helps in the diagnosis and management of presumed spinal gout (2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excellent agreement was observed between DECT readers (k ¼ 0.87; range 0.70-1.00). Although DECT has been used mainly to image peripheral sites, this method can also detect urate deposits centrally, at sites such as the spine [16]. Although this method holds great promise in providing specific images in gout, a number of uncertainties remain.…”
Section: Key Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%