PURPOSE To ascertain if preoperative short-term radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy is not inferior to a standard schedule of long-term chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with distal or middle-third, clinical primary tumor stage 3-4 and/or regional lymph node–positive rectal cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to short-term radiotherapy (25 Gy in five fractions over 1 week) followed by four cycles of chemotherapy (total neoadjuvant therapy [TNT]) or chemoradiotherapy (50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks, concurrently with capecitabine [chemoradiotherapy; CRT]). Total mesorectal excision was undertaken 6-8 weeks after preoperative treatment, with two additional cycles of CAPOX (intravenous oxaliplatin [130 mg/m2, once a day] on day 1 and capecitabine [1,000 mg/m2, twice a day] from days 1 to 14) in the TNT group and six cycles of CAPOX in the CRT group. The primary end point was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS Between August 2015 and August 2018, a total of 599 patients were randomly assigned to receive TNT (n = 302) or CRT (n = 297). At a median follow-up of 35.0 months, 3-year DFS was 64.5% and 62.3% in TNT and CRT groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.883; one-sided 95% CI, not applicable to 1.11; P < .001 for noninferiority). There was no significant difference in metastasis-free survival or locoregional recurrence, but the TNT group had better 3-year overall survival than the CRT group (86.5% v 75.1%; P = .033). Treatment effects on DFS and overall survival were similar regardless of prognostic factors. The prevalence of acute grade III-V toxicities during preoperative treatment was 26.5% in the TNT group versus 12.6% in the CRT group ( P < .001). CONCLUSION Short-term radiotherapy with preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery was efficacious with acceptable toxicity and could be used as an alternative to CRT for locally advanced rectal cancer.
BACKGROUND As one effective treatment for lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastasis (LPNM), laparoscopic LPLN dissection (LPND) is limited due to the complicated anatomy of the pelvic sidewall and various complications after surgery. With regard to improving the accuracy and completeness of LPND as well as safety, we tried an innovative method using indocyanine green (ICG) visualized with a near-infrared (NIR) camera system to guide the detection of LPLNs in patients with middle-low rectal cancer. AIM To investigate whether ICG-enhanced NIR fluorescence-guided imaging is a better technique for LPND in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS A total of 42 middle-low rectal cancer patients with clinical LPNM who underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) and LPND between October 2017 and March 2019 at our institution were assessed and divided into an ICG group and a non-ICG group. Clinical characteristics, operative outcomes, pathological outcomes, and postoperative complication information were compared and analysed between the two groups. RESULTS Compared to the non-ICG group, the ICG group had significantly lower intraoperative blood loss (55.8 ± 37.5 mL vs 108.0 ± 52.7 mL, P = 0.003) and a significantly larger number of LPLNs harvested (11.5 ± 5.9 vs 7.1 ± 4.8, P = 0.017). The LPLNs of two patients in the non-IVG group were residual during LPND. In addition, no significant difference was found in terms of LPND, LPNM, operative time, conversion to laparotomy, preoperative complication, or hospital stay ( P > 0.05). CONCLUSION ICG-enhanced NIR fluorescence-guided imaging could be a feasible and convenient technique to guide LPND because it could bring specific advantages regarding the accuracy and completeness of surgery as well as safety.
3510 Background: It’s presented the results of a phase III trial of short-term radiotherapy (SCRT) combined with chemotherapy versus long-term chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Methods: Patients with distal or middle third, T3-T4 and/or N+ rectal adenocarcinomas diagnosed by MRI, were randomly assigned to experimental group or control group. In experimental group, patients received SCRT (25 Gy / 5 fractions / 5 days), followed by four courses of CAPOX. In control group, patients received LCRT (50 Gy / 25 fractions / 35 days with concurrent capecitabine). Surgery was recommended in both groups and performed 6-8 weeks after preoperative treatment. Two or six courses of CAPOX was prescribed as the postoperative chemotherapy in experimental group and control group, respectively. This trial was a multicenter, open-label, randomized, noninferior, phase III study, and all the patients were from 16 hospitals of China. The primary endpoint for this study was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). Results: From Aug 30, 2015 to Aug 27, 2018, 599 patients were enrolled and entered random. Finally, 591 intention-to-treat (ITT) populations were included in the analysis, 298 patients assigned to SCRT followed by chemotherapy and 293 to CRT. For the experimental group and control group, cT3 and cT4 accounted for 82.3% vs. 84.6% and 15.4% vs. 12.3%, respectively, and approximately 85% were mrN positive (85.6% vs. 84.0%). As a whole, the completion and full-dose completion rates of preoperative treatment were 82.6% vs. 95.2% (p<0.001) and 74.8% vs 93.2% (p<0.001) in the experimental and control groups, respectively. Among the 465 patients who received surgery, 16.6% and 11.8% of them achieved pCR (p=0.134), respectively. Accounting for cCR after preoperative treatment, the total rate of pCR+cCR in experimental group was 22.5% and significantly higher than control group (12.6%, p=0.001). With median follow-up 35.0 months, the HR between experimental and control of DFS was 0.883, with 1-sided noninferiority p-value <0.001, so the noninferiority hypothesis was confirmed. The probability of DFS and OS at 3 years was 64.5% and 86.5% in the experimental group compared with 62.3% and 75.1% in control group. It’s observed the OS rate of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group (p=0.036) and no significant difference in metastasis-free survival or loco-regional recurrence was observed. Conclusions: For LARC with high risk factors, SCRT combined with sequential chemotherapy was noninferior to CRT and could be used as an alternative to LCRT. Meanwhile, SCRT combined with chemotherapy presented a higher cCR+pCR and 3-year overall survival rates as compared with CRT. However, the long term results need to be further followed up. (ClinicalTrails No.: NCT02533271 ). Clinical trial information: NCT00833131.
BackgroundWe observed abnormal HOXB7 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) previously. This study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of HOXB7 and reveal the potential mechanism.MethodsImmunohistochemistry was used to confirm the abnormal expression of HOXB7 in ESCC. The prognostic significance of HOXB7 expression was analyzed in two independent cohorts. RNAi was used to establish two stable HOXB7-knockdown cell strains. CCK8 assay, cell growth curve assay, colony formation assay, flow cycle analysis and tumorigenicity assay in nude mice were employed to investigate the effect of HOXB7 on proliferation in vitro and in vivo.ResultsImmunohistochemistry confirmed the abnormal expression of HOXB7 in ESCC compared with paracancerous mucosa (18/23 vs. 9/23, p=0.039). HOXB7 expression was positively correlated with the T stage, lymph node metastasis and TNM stage. The median survival of patients with high HOXB7 expression was significantly shorter than that with low expression (45 months vs. 137 months, p = 0.007 for cohort 1; 19 months vs. 34 months, p = 0.001 for cohort 2). Multivariate survival analysis showed that HOXB7 expression was another independent prognostic factor (HR [95% CI] = 0.573 [0.341–0.963], p = 0.036 for cohort 1; HR [95%CI] = 0.543 [0.350–0.844], p = 0.024 for cohort 2). Experiments in vitro and in vivo showed that after knockdown of HOXB7, the proliferation rate dropped, growth rate descended, colony-formation ability reduced, G1-phase arrest occurred and the tumorigenicity reduced remarkably.ConclusionsHOXB7 could promote cancer cell proliferation and might be an independent prognostic factor for patients with ESCC.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide, however, genetic-environmental interactions and mechanisms associated with the development of HCC remains largely unclear. Our recent work described novel inactivating mutations of ARID2 (AT-rich interactive domain 2) in four major subtypes of HCC through exomic sequencing of ten HCV-associated HCCs and subsequent evaluation of the tumors from additional affected individuals. Here, we summarize the current knowledge about the relevance of ARID2 in HCC and the implication in future patient care.
In fluorescence imaging and detection, undesired fluorescence interference (such as autofluorescence) often hampers the contrast of the image and even prevents the identification of structures of interest. Here, we develop a quantum coherent modulationenhanced (QCME) single-molecule imaging microscopy (SMIM) to substantially eliminate the strong fluorescence interference, based on manipulation of the excitedstate population probability of a single molecule. By periodically modulating the phase difference between the ultrashort pulse pairs and performing a discrete Fourier transform of the arrival time of emitted photons, the decimation of single molecules from strong interference in QCME-SMIM has been clearly determined, where the signal-tointerference ratio is enhanced by more than 2 orders of magnitude. This technique, confirmed to be universal to organic dyes and linked with biomacromolecules, paves the way to high-contrast bioimaging under unfavorable conditions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.