1977
DOI: 10.2307/1268249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Influential Observation in Linear Regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
500
1
13

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,300 publications
(549 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
500
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum Cook's distance value was related to a F (p, n − p) distribution. Influential values are considered when percentile value is equal or higher than 50 (Cook, 1977;Kutner et al, 2005). All analyses were performed using SPSS version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum Cook's distance value was related to a F (p, n − p) distribution. Influential values are considered when percentile value is equal or higher than 50 (Cook, 1977;Kutner et al, 2005). All analyses were performed using SPSS version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first tested for normality in contaminant and isotopic data using Shapiro-Wilk's test [42], and identified outliers as those with Cook's distance more than 3 [43][44][45]. We used general linearized models (GLMs) to examine the effects of year of collection, age class and for a subset of birds, sex and we restricted our model to primary effects and two-way interactions.…”
Section: (C) Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further analyse the impact of species averages taken from few studies with low sample sizes, we did a post-hoc analysis of leverage to check for the importance of single species in determining the regression coefficients. We calculated Cook's distance for all parameters in all analyses 84 . If a Cook's distance was larger than 0.5, we checked the number of studies and the number of individuals on which the estimate was based.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%