2002
DOI: 10.1177/104063870201400310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Infectious Bursal Disease Virus in Different Lymphoid Organs by Single-Step Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction and Microplate Hybridization Assay

Abstract: Abstract.A rapid and sensitive method for the detection of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) RNA in different chicken lymphoid organs was developed. The method is based on a single-step reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) procedure and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) detection method of amplified products. Vaccinal IBDV strain and field isolates were used for the optimization of RT-PCR and for the determination of conditions for microplate hybridization and colorimetric … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…All these methods have disadvantages, such as being time consuming, labor intensive, expensive, or nonspecific. These methods lack the ability to detect low levels of antigens in tissues [36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these methods have disadvantages, such as being time consuming, labor intensive, expensive, or nonspecific. These methods lack the ability to detect low levels of antigens in tissues [36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods have been developed for the diagnosis of IBD, such as virus isolation in cell culture, embryonated chicken eggs, or young specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chickens and localization of the virus in infected tissues by electron microscopy, fluorescence assay, agar immunodiffusion, antigene-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), or immunohistochemistry [11]. However, all these methods have disadvantages, such as being time consuming, labor intensive, expensive, or non-specific [12]. Recently, various diagnostic methods targeting viral nucleic acids have been elaborated such as conventional reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), real time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) [13].…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Clinical Cases Of Infectious Bursal Disease Usimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pada umumnya identifikasi virus IBD banyak difokuskan pada amplifikasi gen VP2, meskipun Lin et al (1994) IBD (Becht et al, 1988). Teknis diagnosis molekuler tersebut dewasa ini, juga menjadi pilihan karena kemampuan deteksi sangat akurat, sensitif, cepat, dan dapat digunakan menggantikan diagnosis mi krobiologi in vivo dan in vitro (Lin et al,1994;Barlic Maganja et al, 2002). Di samping itu, teknis mole kuler juga dapat diaplikasikan untuk mendeteksi virus IBD yang diekstraksi dari berbagai organ dan leukosit oleh BarlicMaganja et al (2002).…”
Section: Pembahasanunclassified