2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12105-016-0699-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Helicobacter pylori in Nasal Polyps

Abstract: To detect the presence of Helicobacter pylori in nasal polyps. A case-control study was conducted enrolling 35 patients with nasal polyps (cases) and patients undergoing septoplasty (controls). Fresh tissue samples were used for urea broth test and imprint cytology, while formalin fixed tissue sections were used for morphology, special stains and immunohistochemistry for H. pylori. Fresh stool samples from both groups were tested to correlate the gastrointestinal status. H. pylori was detected in 40.0 % (14/35… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
20
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(40 reference statements)
5
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…H&E could not pick up any cases of H. pylori in nasal polyps, but a typical hyperplasia of the lining epithelium and lymphoid aggregates as a significant change in the usual morphology of nasal polyps of truly positive cases 3 (8.57%) as the non exposed part of the polyp was sent for H & E stain, were seen ( Figure 3) similar finding was seen by Bansal et al 18 But different and larger studies are required to confirm these findings. However, in all above studies there was a difference in detection rate by urease, Giemsa, H&E and culture method.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…H&E could not pick up any cases of H. pylori in nasal polyps, but a typical hyperplasia of the lining epithelium and lymphoid aggregates as a significant change in the usual morphology of nasal polyps of truly positive cases 3 (8.57%) as the non exposed part of the polyp was sent for H & E stain, were seen ( Figure 3) similar finding was seen by Bansal et al 18 But different and larger studies are required to confirm these findings. However, in all above studies there was a difference in detection rate by urease, Giemsa, H&E and culture method.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…positivity which is lower than our observations. [17][18][19] Giemsa stain, in the study conducted by Al-Abbasi et al reported higher rates of 42% were positive when compared to our study. 20 Both urease test and Giemsa stain is easy to perform, cheap and has sensitivity 90-92%.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study group included 8 patients with asthma, 6 with allergic rhinitis, and 2 with intolerance to nonsteroidal anti-inflamma- (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15) . Admittedly, this prevalence could indeed be greater if the bacterium in the nose would follow a similar mosaic pattern of mucosal infection as in the stomach, with patches of diseased mucosa alternating with non-infected normal mucosa, in which case it would require repeated and extensive sampling to allow for a positive H. pylori result (five different sites, according to some) (20) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Helicobacter pylori DNA has been detected in a number of extragastric locations, such as the oral cavity, tonsils and adenoids (1,2) , and even the middle ear and paranasal sinuses (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15) . However, the significance of the microorganism's presence at these aero-digestive and respiratory sites is still unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%