2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/575297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Free-Living Amoebae Using Amoebal Enrichment in a Wastewater Treatment Plant of Gauteng Province, South Africa

Abstract: Free-living amoebae pose a potential health risk in water systems as they may be pathogenic and harbor potential pathogenic bacteria known as amoebae resistant bacteria. Free-living amoebae were observed in 150 (87.2%) of the environmental water samples. In particular, Acanthamoeba sp. was identified in 22 (12.8%) using amoebal enrichment and confirmed by molecular analysis. FLA were isolated in all 8 stages of the wastewater treatment plant using the amoebal enrichment technique. A total of 16 (9.3%) samples … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results correspond to the data obtained by Muchesa et al . [ 28 ] and Behera and Satpathy [ 29 ]. Contradictory results were described by Garajová et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results correspond to the data obtained by Muchesa et al . [ 28 ] and Behera and Satpathy [ 29 ]. Contradictory results were described by Garajová et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These enteric protozoa are isolated frequently from diarrheal patients in developing regions such as Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa [33]. However, recently Muchesa et al detected 12.8% Acanthamoeba from 172 wastewater samples [34]. Our study presents the first report about detection of the following protozoa: A. castellanii, T. gondii, C. owczarzaki, B. hominis, C. muris , and T. vaginitis from zeers found in Gadarif, Juba, and Khartoum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More commonly, Legionella are identified by 16S sequencing of DNA extracts from bacteria isolated by Legionella -selective culture methods on bacteriological medium (Salloum et al, 2002 ; Sheehan et al, 2005 ) or enrichment through co-culture of environmental samples with amoebae (Pagnier et al, 2008 ). Protozoa may be identified microscopically by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or the morphological appearance of trophozoites (Jacquier et al, 2013 ; Muchesa et al, 2014 ), or by 18S sequencing of DNA extracts following an amoebal enrichment step in which individual isolates are cultured on lawns of bacteria permissive to amoebal grazing (Greub and Raoult, 2004 ; Delafont et al, 2013 ; Muchesa et al, 2014 ). Thus, while most co-isolation studies do not provide direct evidence of Legionella growth within the protozoa identified, they can be used to predict environmentally relevant interactions, to substantiate experimental findings from co-culture techniques and are likely to implicate new protozoan species as potential hosts of Legionella .…”
Section: Methods For Defining Protozoan Hosts Of Legionellamentioning
confidence: 99%