2014
DOI: 10.5958/0976-0555.2014.00010.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of difficult calvings in dairy cows using boosted classification trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
14
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
14
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, Sp and Acc (0.8186 to 0.8287 and 0.8111 to 0.8201, respectively) were approximately 7.0% lower compared with the values presented in the aforementioned study, in which LN were not investigated. In a similar research on dystocia detection in dairy heifers by means of boosted classification trees [ 10 ], Se and Acc on the training set were also higher (0.894 and 0.935, respectively) in comparison with the maximum values obtained in the present work, apart from Sp, which was 5.0% lower. However, in the case of GDA, Basarab et al [ 7 ] and Arthur et al [ 13 ] reported lower Se (0.222 to 0.471 and 0.255 to 0.400, respectively), with higher Sp (0.944 to 0.980 and 0.967 to 0.980, respectively) and Acc (0.852 to 0.917 and 0.846 to 0.885, respectively) investigating dystocia detection in beef heifers using linear discriminant function analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, Sp and Acc (0.8186 to 0.8287 and 0.8111 to 0.8201, respectively) were approximately 7.0% lower compared with the values presented in the aforementioned study, in which LN were not investigated. In a similar research on dystocia detection in dairy heifers by means of boosted classification trees [ 10 ], Se and Acc on the training set were also higher (0.894 and 0.935, respectively) in comparison with the maximum values obtained in the present work, apart from Sp, which was 5.0% lower. However, in the case of GDA, Basarab et al [ 7 ] and Arthur et al [ 13 ] reported lower Se (0.222 to 0.471 and 0.255 to 0.400, respectively), with higher Sp (0.944 to 0.980 and 0.967 to 0.980, respectively) and Acc (0.852 to 0.917 and 0.846 to 0.885, respectively) investigating dystocia detection in beef heifers using linear discriminant function analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…E.g. Zaborski and Grzesiak [ 8 , 9 ] applied ANN to dystocia detection in Polish Holstein-Friesian Black-and-White cattle, Zaborski et al [ 10 ] used boosted classification trees for the same purpose, Morrison et al [ 11 , 12 ], Basarab et al [ 7 ], Arthur et al [ 13 ], and Johnson [ 14 ] applied linear discriminant function analysis for dystocia prediction in beef heifers, whereas Piwczyński et al [ 15 ] used decision trees for analyzing factors affecting dystocia in dairy cows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 0.71 (calculated from the same data used for training the models), somewhat higher than the average AUC for DT in our study (0.64), with the accuracy reported (61.5% correctly classified calving events) very similar to our DT model. Zaborski et al (2014a) compared assisted calving and UC events with boosted classification of our NN model performed on UC events (93%), but significantly higher than its performance on assisted calving and DC events (28% and 0%). When our models' predictions were reclassified to allow comparisons, they showed comparable performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The algorithm produces binary nodes by dividing each node into two child nodes, recursively until homogeneous subgroups are obtained in the tree diagram. With the development of computer technology at the present time, statistical analysis of the algorithm is feasible in SAS (Statistical Analysis System), SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) (Ali et al, 2015), and STATISTICA (Camdeviren et al, 2007;Nisbet et In the classification problems, usage of various datamining algorithms for animal science has recently been recorded for beef cattle Kucukonder et al, 2015), dairy cattle (Grzesiak et al, 2010;Grzesiak et al, 2011;Zaborski et al, 2014;Bayram et al, 2015), and fisheries science (Topal et al, 2010). Yet, application of data-mining algorithms for poultry science has been scarce for Japanese quail Uckardes et al, 2014) and Chukar partridge (Alectoris chukar) (Karabag et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%