2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2010.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of cows with insemination problems using selected classification models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
2
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
32
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental data sets were randomly divided into training (70%; 1260 observations), validating (15%; 270 observations) and testing (15%; 270 observations) sets. For finding the classification performance, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy (category-specific and the model's overall performance) were computed based on the following definitions (Grzesiak et al, 2010;Pourreza et al, 2012):…”
Section: Study Area and Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Experimental data sets were randomly divided into training (70%; 1260 observations), validating (15%; 270 observations) and testing (15%; 270 observations) sets. For finding the classification performance, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy (category-specific and the model's overall performance) were computed based on the following definitions (Grzesiak et al, 2010;Pourreza et al, 2012):…”
Section: Study Area and Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AUC values obtained were 0.98 for the LRST, 0.96 for the ARST and 0.98 for the HRST test sets. The value of AUC represents the discrimination ability of a classifier (Grzesiak et al, 2010) and the value for a realistic classifier should be >0.5, with the AUC range Categorizing pig lying behaviour between 1 (best separation between the values) and 0.5 (no distributional differences between values) (Fawcett, 2006). …”
Section: Lying Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In animal science, ANNs have been successfully applied to various areas, such as diagnosis of diseases, such as mastitis and lameness (Yang et al, 1999;Cavero et al, 2008;Sun, 2008;Hassan et al, 2009;Roush et al, 2001); the prediction of forward-looking traits (Grzesiak et al, 2003;Salehi et al, 1998;Sanzogni and Kerr, 2001;Kominakis et al, 2002;Hosseinia et al, 2007;Görgülü, 2012); animal breeding studies (Shahinfar et al, 2012;Salehi et al, 1997;Grzesiak et al, 2010); the prediction of the nutrient content in manure (Chen et al, 2008(Chen et al, , 2009; and oestrus detection (Krieter et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm produces binary nodes by dividing each node into two child nodes, recursively until homogeneous subgroups are obtained in the tree diagram. With the development of computer technology at the present time, statistical analysis of the algorithm is feasible in SAS (Statistical Analysis System), SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) (Ali et al, 2015), and STATISTICA (Camdeviren et al, 2007;Nisbet et In the classification problems, usage of various datamining algorithms for animal science has recently been recorded for beef cattle Kucukonder et al, 2015), dairy cattle (Grzesiak et al, 2010;Grzesiak et al, 2011;Zaborski et al, 2014;Bayram et al, 2015), and fisheries science (Topal et al, 2010). Yet, application of data-mining algorithms for poultry science has been scarce for Japanese quail Uckardes et al, 2014) and Chukar partridge (Alectoris chukar) (Karabag et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%