2003
DOI: 10.1348/014466503762842048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of children's malingering on Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices

Abstract: A formula for detecting faked Raven's SPM profiles was cross-validated on 44 children and adolescents (ages 7-17). It yielded a false negative rate of 64%. However, a rule using three very easy items (i.e., any of A3, A4 or B1 missed) yielded a hit rate of 95%, with 5% false positive and negative rates. All but two of the participants were able to produce lower scores when asked to fake the test.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Information on maternal age (year in continuous), maternal prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) (kg/m 2 in continuous), maternal education level (low: < 3 years of high school; intermediate: 3+ years of secondary education; and, high: university degree or higher vocational training), maternal ethnicity (Dutch national origin, other-Western, and non-Western), household income (<1200 euro/month, 1200–2000 euro/month, >2000 euro/month), marital status (married/partner, single), parity (0, 1, or 2+), maternal smoking (no smoking, smoked until pregnancy recognized, and continued smoking during pregnancy), maternal alcohol use (no alcohol consumption, alcohol consumption until pregnancy recognized, continued occasionally (<1 glass/week for at least two trimesters), and continued frequently (≥1 glass/week for at least two trimesters)), and maternal psychological dysfunction (score in continuous), using the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), was collected during pregnancy. Maternal IQ was determined using the computerized Ravens Advanced Progressive Matrices Test, set I , when mother-child pairs visited the 6-year examination (score in continuous). Data on child sex (female, male) was collected at birth and child age at assessment (years in continuous) was reported during the 6-year examination.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information on maternal age (year in continuous), maternal prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) (kg/m 2 in continuous), maternal education level (low: < 3 years of high school; intermediate: 3+ years of secondary education; and, high: university degree or higher vocational training), maternal ethnicity (Dutch national origin, other-Western, and non-Western), household income (<1200 euro/month, 1200–2000 euro/month, >2000 euro/month), marital status (married/partner, single), parity (0, 1, or 2+), maternal smoking (no smoking, smoked until pregnancy recognized, and continued smoking during pregnancy), maternal alcohol use (no alcohol consumption, alcohol consumption until pregnancy recognized, continued occasionally (<1 glass/week for at least two trimesters), and continued frequently (≥1 glass/week for at least two trimesters)), and maternal psychological dysfunction (score in continuous), using the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), was collected during pregnancy. Maternal IQ was determined using the computerized Ravens Advanced Progressive Matrices Test, set I , when mother-child pairs visited the 6-year examination (score in continuous). Data on child sex (female, male) was collected at birth and child age at assessment (years in continuous) was reported during the 6-year examination.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, data was collected on maternal age (years), parity (0, 1, or ), smoking (no smoking during pregnancy, smoking until pregnancy recognized, and continued smoking during pregnancy), alcohol intake during pregnancy [no alcohol consumption during pregnancy, alcohol consumption until pregnancy recognized, continued occasionally ( ), and continued frequently ( )], marital status (married/partner or single), household total net income [ (i.e., below the Dutch social security level), 1,200–2,000 euros/month, ], highest completed education level [low ( at general secondary school) intermediate ( of secondary education), and high (university degree or higher vocational training)], ethnicity (Dutch national origin, other-Western, and non-Western), and folic acid intake (none, started in first 10 wks of pregnancy, and started preconception). Maternal IQ was examined when mother–child pairs attended the 6-y examination and was assessed using a computerized Ravens Advanced Progressive Matrices Test, Set I ( McKinzey et al. 2003 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, MacAllister et al (2009) advised caution in the interpretation of the TOMM in young epilepsy patients with a very low IQ (especially if behavioral problems are also evident) and with ongoing interictal epileptiform activity that may disrupt attention. As with any research, appropriate cautions should also be used for studies that involve low sample sizes or are in need of further validation studies, as is the case with a simulator study performed by McKinzey, Prieler, and Raven (2003) with Standard Progressive Matrices (Raven, 1958) in 44 children aged 7-17 years of age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%