“…In another example, a recently published RCT found that 14 days of Danhong injection (i.e., a type of Chinese patent medicine) in combination with standard western medicine treatment was more effective than western medicine alone for relieving angina in patients with coronary artery disease, with an increased proportion of patients with clinically significant changes on the angina-frequency, as assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (difference in proportion: 12.78% [95% CI, 5.86%-19.71%] at day 30 since treatment initiation, 13.82% [95% CI, 6.82%-20.82%] at day 60, and 8.95% [95% CI, 2.06%-15.85%] at day 90). 18 Moreover, a post-market surveillance study showed good tolerance of Danhong injection in a real-world setting, with an incidence rate of adverse drug events (ADEs) being 0.35%, among which 92.6% events were mild to moderate (e.g., pruritus, dizziness, headache, superficial phlebitis, flushing). 19 These studies may not make up sufficient evidence ground for a guideline about the overall clinical application of Danhong injection.…”