2017
DOI: 10.4172/2329-888x.1000167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and Quantification of Formalin Adulteration in Cow Milk Using Near Infrared Spectroscopy Combined with Multivariate Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the observed peaks in the region of 4200, 4300, 5800, 8200, and 8600 cm −1 were attributed to the CH group. The absorption at 5030, 4850, and 4400 cm −1 were related to the NH group 53,54 . The spectral range of 6400–5500 cm −1 may also be attributed to the sulfonate group and other chemical components of SDS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For example, the observed peaks in the region of 4200, 4300, 5800, 8200, and 8600 cm −1 were attributed to the CH group. The absorption at 5030, 4850, and 4400 cm −1 were related to the NH group 53,54 . The spectral range of 6400–5500 cm −1 may also be attributed to the sulfonate group and other chemical components of SDS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…After that partial least regression model was built for the quantification of the level of formalin in cow milk and R-square was found to be 93%, Root mean square error of cross validation=1.38, root mean square error of prediction=1.50 and less 2% formalin can be quantified. From the obtained results, they conclude that this method was successfully used to quantify the lowest level of formalin (not more the 2%) present in milk with a non-destructive and cheaper manner and also sample preparation was not much needed [45] (Table 5).…”
Section: Formalin Adulteration In Cow Milkmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The NIR spectroscopy combined with improved ν-Support vector machine produces output with maximum validation correct ratio ,which Correlates positively with the adulterant solution's content and discrimination adulteration equals or exceeds 5%. A new method of identifying formalin in raw cow milk was analyzed using NIR (700-2500 nm) combined with multivariate analysis [22]. The PLS (Partial Least Square) model obtained a good prediction with a root mean square error prediction value of 1.45% and quantified formalin adulteration with less than 2%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%