2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and molecular characterization of canine babesiosis causative agent Babesia canis in the naturally infected dog in Lithuania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arthropod-borne diseases are increasing in Lithuania [69, 70] and other European countries [71]. The samples examined in this study were also tested for the presence of tick-borne pathogens such as Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Babesia canis and possible co-infection with D. repens (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arthropod-borne diseases are increasing in Lithuania [69, 70] and other European countries [71]. The samples examined in this study were also tested for the presence of tick-borne pathogens such as Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Babesia canis and possible co-infection with D. repens (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, not all animals showed clinical signs at the time of diagnosis. Variable rates of babesiosis have been reported worldwide, from 0.1% in Turkey to 87.8% in Lithuania [16,17]. The fact that Babesia species are transported transovarially through ticks implies that the infection may remain endemic in areas for a long time [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the time between traveling in the United Kingdom, Poland, Germany, and France and the onset of clinical signs of babesiosis in dog 1, and the lack of antibodies against Babesia in dogs 2 and 3, the described infections were likely related to the travel. However, autochthonous B. canis infections have been diagnosed in the other Baltic countries than Estonia [ 1 , 17 ] and it is therefore possible that the infections were acquired in Estonia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%