2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cobme.2021.100285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and localization of deep sources in magnetoencephalography: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ICA has been long used in surface recordings, removing noisy components, such as cardiac activity or eye blinking [ 32 ], and identifying task-related neural sources [ 33 , 34 ] or epileptic generators [ 35 , 36 ]. Moreover, it has been proposed as a tool to disentangle deep brain activities hidden at the surface by superficial signals with higher amplitudes [ 37 ]. Although its use in intracranial recordings is reduced in comparison, its effectiveness has been well studied [ 31 , 38 ], and it has been used to dissociate local and remote cortical field potentials [ 39 , 40 ] and different current generators in the hippocampus [ 7 , 16 , 41 , 42 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICA has been long used in surface recordings, removing noisy components, such as cardiac activity or eye blinking [ 32 ], and identifying task-related neural sources [ 33 , 34 ] or epileptic generators [ 35 , 36 ]. Moreover, it has been proposed as a tool to disentangle deep brain activities hidden at the surface by superficial signals with higher amplitudes [ 37 ]. Although its use in intracranial recordings is reduced in comparison, its effectiveness has been well studied [ 31 , 38 ], and it has been used to dissociate local and remote cortical field potentials [ 39 , 40 ] and different current generators in the hippocampus [ 7 , 16 , 41 , 42 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is largely due to the fact that MEG is less sensitive to deep cortical sources and subcortical sources ( Agirre-Arrizubieta et al, 2009 , Attal et al, 2009 , Ahlfors et al, 2010 , Wennberg et al, 2011 , Attal and Schwartz, 2013 ). Deep source localization has long been considered a difficult problem ( Hillebrand and Barnes, 2002 , Attal et al, 2009 ), especially given the need for the development of radically new algorithms capable of achieving such a goal ( Krishnaswamy et al, 2017 , Bénar et al, 2021 ). Recent attempts have been made to address the issue, but such studies usually require the aid of simultaneous intracranial recordings ( Juárez-Martinez et al, 2018 , Pizzo et al, 2019 , Pellegrino et al, 2020 ) or prior knowledge of the activation patterns ( Krishnaswamy et al, 2017 ) while large-scale validation is still not available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is largely due to the fact that MEG is less sensitive to deep cortical sources and subcortical sources (Agirre-Arrizubieta et al, 2009; Attal et al, 2009; Ahlfors et al, 2010; Wennberg et al, 2011; Attal and Schwartz, 2013). Deep source localization has long been considered a difficult problem (Hillebrand and Barnes, 2002; Attal et al, 2009), especially given the need for the development of radically new algorithms capable of achieving such a goal (Krishnaswamy et al, 2017; Bénar et al, 2021). Recent attempts have been made to address the issue, but such studies usually require the aid of simultaneous intracranial recordings (Juárez-Martinez et al, 2018; Pizzo et al, 2019; Pellegrino et al, 2020) or prior knowledge of the activation patterns (Krishnaswamy et al, 2017) while large-scale validation is still not available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%