2017
DOI: 10.1007/s13042-017-0682-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and localization of crowd behavior using a novel tracklet-based model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the research on crowd behavior has focused on two major aspects: crowd behavior detection techniques and the analysis of crowd behavior in different situations. Many researchers have suggested using different techniques to detect crowd behavior, such as using video cameras[7,21,27], a tracklet-based model[28], a hybrid tracking model and a GSLM-based neural network[29], the particle entropy[30], and energy models[31], an Air Patrol Robot[32], an entropic path-integral model[33,34], and so on. In addition, a few researchers have analyzed the crowd behavior under different circumstances, such as during an earthquake evacuation[35], in a t-shaped channel[36], in a football stadium[37] and during high-stress evacuations[38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the research on crowd behavior has focused on two major aspects: crowd behavior detection techniques and the analysis of crowd behavior in different situations. Many researchers have suggested using different techniques to detect crowd behavior, such as using video cameras[7,21,27], a tracklet-based model[28], a hybrid tracking model and a GSLM-based neural network[29], the particle entropy[30], and energy models[31], an Air Patrol Robot[32], an entropic path-integral model[33,34], and so on. In addition, a few researchers have analyzed the crowd behavior under different circumstances, such as during an earthquake evacuation[35], in a t-shaped channel[36], in a football stadium[37] and during high-stress evacuations[38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also used only the violence in movies dataset and obtained 96.9% accuracy. Moreover, in [42], two descriptors were used to detect and localize the abnormal behaviors; they used a simplified histogram of oriented tracklets (sHOT) combined with a dense optical flow to recognize abnormal behavior at the final result and obtained an accuracy of 82.2% for the violent crowd dataset. In [14], the authors used ViF and then classified the final prediction using SVM, where they used five-fold cross-validation for testing and obtained 82.90% accuracy for the hockey fight dataset and 81.3% for the violent crowd dataset.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of neighbors was set as k = 5 and λ = 500 in Eq. (22). For the initial clustering we used Elkan's kmeans clustering algorithm from the VLFeat toolbox [33], which was faster than the standard Lloyd's k-means.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sharma and Guho [28] proposed a two-step trajectory clustering approach (TCA) to segmenting crowd flow patterns; a trajectory extraction step to detect and track blocks or regions in the video, followed by a clustering step that utilized the shape, the location and the density of the trajectory in the neighborhood. Rabiee et al [22] detected abnormal behaviors from crowd scenes using a spatio-temporal tracklet based descriptor extracted from 3D patches. The tracklets were extracted by tracking randomly selected points in video frames within a short period of time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%