The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2019.2898558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and Control of Unannounced Exercise in the Artificial Pancreas Without Additional Physiological Signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current artificial pancreas systems also have several challenges that need to be addressed if they are to be used in conjunction with bioelectronic medicine. Among them, the delays in interstitial glucose sensing and hormonal subcutaneous absorption (Ramli et al 2019;Taleb et al 2019;Gingras et al 2018;Herrero et al 2017), failures in the insulin pump (Meneghetti et al 2018), and glycaemic control during meals (Ramkissoon et al 2018) and exercise (Ramkissoon et al 2020) are the most critical. Despite these challenges, the use of the artificial pancreas is associated with high levels of satisfaction and quality of life, and reduced fear of hypoglycaemic events among the users (Ramli et al 2019).…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current artificial pancreas systems also have several challenges that need to be addressed if they are to be used in conjunction with bioelectronic medicine. Among them, the delays in interstitial glucose sensing and hormonal subcutaneous absorption (Ramli et al 2019;Taleb et al 2019;Gingras et al 2018;Herrero et al 2017), failures in the insulin pump (Meneghetti et al 2018), and glycaemic control during meals (Ramkissoon et al 2018) and exercise (Ramkissoon et al 2020) are the most critical. Despite these challenges, the use of the artificial pancreas is associated with high levels of satisfaction and quality of life, and reduced fear of hypoglycaemic events among the users (Ramli et al 2019).…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the DRB algorithm may not be applicable in fully automatic AP systems, in which patients do not need to announce meals. Finally, the adjustments of IOB is a major task for AP systems which considers the SAFE layer, and the proper adjustment of this constraint also plays an important role even during physical activity [39,40], by reducing the amount of injected insulin during and after exercise.…”
Section: Scenario Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main challenges for BG regulation in T1D are the disturbances in terms of meals, exercise, stress, and variability (inter-patient and intra-patient). The UVa/Padova simulator allows the incorporation of different meal scenarios for the virtual patient (VP) population, allowing researchers to analyze the effectiveness of a control algorithm [16][17][18][19][20][21][22], validate optimization and adaptation strategies for insulin delivery [23][24][25][26], develop disturbance detection algorithms for meals [27][28][29] and exercise [30], develop methods for mitigating the risks of hypoglycemia [31,32], and integrate machine learning algorithms into conventional diabetes therapy and bolus calculator for the treatment of T1D patients [33][34][35]. In the literature, the meal scenarios used for testing BG regulation effectiveness are based on typical values considering three meals per day [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%