2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2011.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and classification of voltage disturbances using a Fuzzy-ARTMAP-wavelet network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Discussion Table 7 summarizes a performance comparison of the proposed method against previous works in reviewed literature, through percentage of effectiveness. In [17,[39][40][41], the PQD H and I in Table 1 are considered as the same disturbance; therefore, these two classes are not included in the comparison table. On the other hand, in [28], just the overall percentage of effectiveness during PQD classification is reported.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Discussion Table 7 summarizes a performance comparison of the proposed method against previous works in reviewed literature, through percentage of effectiveness. In [17,[39][40][41], the PQD H and I in Table 1 are considered as the same disturbance; therefore, these two classes are not included in the comparison table. On the other hand, in [28], just the overall percentage of effectiveness during PQD classification is reported.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in [28], just the overall percentage of effectiveness during PQD classification is reported. These figures were obtained from the best performance of the corresponding methodology [17,28,[39][40][41], considering the lowest SNR treated on each of them. From Table 7, it is clear that the proposed methodology is able to correctly classify more different PQDs than any other method from the reviewed literature, using less features from the analyzed voltage/current signal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations