2001
DOI: 10.1071/ar01027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and analysis systems for microsatellite markers in wheat

Abstract: This paper describes and discusses strategies for screening microsatellites for use in plant genetic research and illustrates how a subset of useful microsatellites can be optimised for implementation on breeding and research using a range of techniques. Beginning with the initial screening of microsatellites for potential polymorphisms in a core set of potential parental lines, through to scaling up for mapping or breeding purposes, we present a time- and cost-effective approach to microsatellite analysis in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the abundance of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and development of sophisticated high-throughput SNP detection systems, it has recently been proposed that SNP markers will have a great influence on future mapping research studies and MAS (Rafalski, 2002;Koebner & Summers, 2003). At present, methods for detection and analysis of widely-used markers are becoming faster and more sophisticated, and many of these methods are automated Hori et al, 2003;Rampling et al, 2001;Warburton et al, 2002). One example of an improvement in the efficiency of marker analysis is multiplex PCR, which enables multiple marker loci to be tested simultaneously Donini et al, 1998;Masi et al, 2003).…”
Section: Future Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the abundance of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and development of sophisticated high-throughput SNP detection systems, it has recently been proposed that SNP markers will have a great influence on future mapping research studies and MAS (Rafalski, 2002;Koebner & Summers, 2003). At present, methods for detection and analysis of widely-used markers are becoming faster and more sophisticated, and many of these methods are automated Hori et al, 2003;Rampling et al, 2001;Warburton et al, 2002). One example of an improvement in the efficiency of marker analysis is multiplex PCR, which enables multiple marker loci to be tested simultaneously Donini et al, 1998;Masi et al, 2003).…”
Section: Future Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genescan analysis of PCR products of the whole DH population, was carried out with the addition of the 0.04 mlL/PCR reaction dUTP-labelled with the fluorescent dye, R110 (Applied Biosystems). The PCR product was run on an ABI 377 sequencer and the data subsequently processed using Genescan 3.1 software (Rampling et al 2001). …”
Section: Wheat Dna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amplification conditions for the PCR reaction were an initial cycle at 95C for 5 min, followed by 38 cycles of; 95C for 30 s, 58C for 30 s and 72C for 1 min, followed by a final extension at 72C for 5.25 min. PCR products were visualised as described by Rampling et al (2001). Genescan analysis of PCR products of the whole DH population, was carried out with the addition of the 0.04 mlL/PCR reaction dUTP-labelled with the fluorescent dye, R110 (Applied Biosystems).…”
Section: Wheat Dna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCR reactions were carried out using an M13-tagged forward primer (Rampling et al 2001) as previously described (Li et al 2009). The reaction mixture (10 μl) contained 20 ng template DNA, 1 pmol forward primer, 5 pmol reverse primer, 5 pmol M13 (−29) primer, 1 μl of 10 × PCR buffer, 0.8 μl of 2.5 mM dNTPs, and 0.5 U Taq polymerase.…”
Section: Molecular Marker Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%