2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting subarachnoid hemorrhage: Comparison of combined FLAIR/SWI versus CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
61
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
61
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This similarity may explain why the interobserver agreement was significantly lower by using T2* and SWI compared with DIR. However, in agreement with previous studies, 19,20 T2* and SWI were particularly useful for detecting IVH, while FLAIR and DIR sequences failed to detect small amounts of intraventricular bleeding. Such findings may suggest that both SWI and DIR should be performed in patients with suspected SAH.…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This similarity may explain why the interobserver agreement was significantly lower by using T2* and SWI compared with DIR. However, in agreement with previous studies, 19,20 T2* and SWI were particularly useful for detecting IVH, while FLAIR and DIR sequences failed to detect small amounts of intraventricular bleeding. Such findings may suggest that both SWI and DIR should be performed in patients with suspected SAH.…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…17 Previous studies have suggested that SWI could accurately detect small amounts of SAH and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH). [18][19][20] A recent study focusing on the detection of microbleeds also demonstrated that SWI had a greater sensitivity for blood products than the conventional T2* sequence. 21 However, no study available compares the diagnostic performance of T2* and SWI for the detection of spontaneous SAH, to our knowledge.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SE: Spin-echo suppression and T1-shortening (FLAIR has an intrinsic T1 contrast in addition to the well known T2 contrast effect) [12] . CNR values of ICM on FLAIR images were not the highest in our experiment.…”
Section: A B C Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences have been shown to be equivalent or better than CT for the detection of acute subarachnoid hemorrhage, 31 with increased sensitivity for acute and subacute hemorrhage with the addition of T2* sequences. 32,33 MR imaging has also been shown to be superior to CT in detecting diffuse axonal injury. [34][35][36] In acute spinal trauma, Morais et al 37 demonstrated that MR imaging is superior to CT for the detection of bone swelling, posterior ligamentous complex injury, disc herniation, cord compression, and cord swelling.…”
Section: Impetus For Changementioning
confidence: 99%