2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting Protein–Ligand Interaction from Integrated Transient Induced Molecular Electronic Signal (i-TIMES)

Abstract: Quantitative information about protein–ligand interactions is central to drug discovery. To obtain the quintessential reaction dissociation constant, ideally measurements of reactions should be performed without perturbations by molecular labeling or immobilization. The technique of transient induced molecular electrical signal (TIMES) has provided a promising technique to meet such requirements, and its performance in a microfluidic environment further offers the potential for high throughput and reduced cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…35 Both of the GPCR binding pairs we measured involve electrostatic interactions, since the reported binding site of GPR55 is hydrophilic, 43 and ADRB2 is partially hydrophilic. 44 In addition, the ionic screening effect also affects local pH value near the sensor surface, 45 which could also affect protein conformation and binding kinetics. Thus, it is not surprising that the affinity measured under normal and diluted PBS produces different values.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 Both of the GPCR binding pairs we measured involve electrostatic interactions, since the reported binding site of GPR55 is hydrophilic, 43 and ADRB2 is partially hydrophilic. 44 In addition, the ionic screening effect also affects local pH value near the sensor surface, 45 which could also affect protein conformation and binding kinetics. Thus, it is not surprising that the affinity measured under normal and diluted PBS produces different values.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%