2014
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting frogs as prey in the diets of introduced mammals: a comparison between morphological and DNA‐based diet analyses

Abstract: Amphibians are currently the most threatened group of vertebrates worldwide, and introduced fauna play a major role in their decline. The control of introduced predators to protect endangered species is often based on predation rates derived from diet studies of predators, but prey detection probabilities using different techniques are variable. We measured the detectability of frogs as prey, using morphological and DNA-based diet analyses, in the stomachs and faeces of four mammal species that have been intro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
66
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It also confirms the importance of developing a morphological identification tool based on body scales instead of bones to measure skink predation by rodents. DNA-based methods of diet analysis are increasingly popular and may significantly improve prey detection and identification in the rodent diet (Egeter et al 2015;Zarzoso-Lacoste et al 2016). But such methods require access to prey DNA, which is not possible in our context because of the rarity and patrimonial status associated with most Caledonian skink species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also confirms the importance of developing a morphological identification tool based on body scales instead of bones to measure skink predation by rodents. DNA-based methods of diet analysis are increasingly popular and may significantly improve prey detection and identification in the rodent diet (Egeter et al 2015;Zarzoso-Lacoste et al 2016). But such methods require access to prey DNA, which is not possible in our context because of the rarity and patrimonial status associated with most Caledonian skink species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After morphological analysis, samples were homogenized and DNA was extracted following Egeter, Bishop, and Robertson (), using the Qiagen DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen). All PCR plates included two positive controls (DNA from Archey's and Hochstetter's frogs) and negative controls (every eighth well).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aerosol‐resistant pipette tips were used throughout all PCR procedures. As a qualitative assessment of the prevalence of potential false negatives (e.g., Oehm, Juen, Nagiller, Neuhauser, & Traugott, ), where adequate DNA was not extracted or PCR inhibition may have occurred, all stomach samples were subject to PCR using “universal” 12S vertebrate primers (L1091/H1478; Kocher et al, ), using PCR conditions as detailed by Egeter, Bishop et al (). This provided an estimation of the number of samples resulting in amplifiable DNA in general.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, invasive mammals can have a variable diet between native and introduced ranges (Ballari & Barrios‐García ), making it difficult to predict what they will consume in their introduced range. DNA metabarcoding is a promising method: it allows the identification of multiple dietary components of hundreds of individuals and increases prey detection from 2% using morphological diagnostics to 70% using metabarcoding (Pompanon et al , Egeter et al ).…”
Section: Negative Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%