1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1386-5056(99)00020-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting adverse drug reactions to improve patient outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of computer-based decision support tools based on electronic medical records in the management of adverse events has been shown to aid the detection of adverse events, improve patient outcome and enhance clinician competence in drug therapy. 7,[17][18][19] Classen et al demonstrated an 800% increase in the number of adverse drug events identified compared with spontaneous reporting. 11 Therefore, the need for monitoring hospital wards electronically for ADRs has been stressed repeatedly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of computer-based decision support tools based on electronic medical records in the management of adverse events has been shown to aid the detection of adverse events, improve patient outcome and enhance clinician competence in drug therapy. 7,[17][18][19] Classen et al demonstrated an 800% increase in the number of adverse drug events identified compared with spontaneous reporting. 11 Therefore, the need for monitoring hospital wards electronically for ADRs has been stressed repeatedly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The availability and use of large computerized clinical databases linked to electronic medical records could provide a tool for the early detection of ADRs and thus help clinicians to react appropriately in time. 7 It has been shown in several studies that computerized monitoring, using alerts based on laboratory data, can facilitate ADR detection. [8][9][10][11][12] This study was undertaken with the following aims: (i) to provide data on the type and incidence of ADRs in gastroenterology; (ii) to modify the generation of computerized alerts in order to increase the specificity of the system and to evaluate its effectiveness; (iii) to compare chart reviews and modified generation of computerized alerts, representing two different methodological approaches to the identification of ADRs; and (iv) to analyse the impact of ADR detection on the behaviour of physicians.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because medical record review is constrained by the completeness and accuracy of the information recorded (40–42), our analysis may partially reflect quality of documentation rather than quality of care. In addition, medical charts do not provide accurate information on adherence to medical treatment or on the magnitude of use of over‐the‐counter medications (43–46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of prescription data available to clinical researchers, pharmaceutical scientists, and clinician-scientists continues to grow, creating an analyzable resource for generating insights that can help improve the healthcare system [4,5]. Healthcare providers use modern EMR-based systems to identify adverse drug events [6,7], study medication-medication interactions [8], investigate medication effects on particular medical conditions [9,10], and ultimately prevent medication errors [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%