2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55759-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detectability assessment of a satellite sensor for lower tropospheric ozone responses to its precursors emission changes in East Asian summer

Abstract: Satellite sensors are powerful tools to monitor the spatiotemporal variations of air pollutants in large scales, but it has been challenging to detect surface O3 due to the presence of abundant stratospheric and upper tropospheric O3. East Asia is one of the most polluted regions in the world, but anthropogenic emissions such as NOx and SO2 began to decrease in 2010s. This trend was well observed by satellites, but the spatiotemporal impacts of these emission trends on O3 have not been well understood. Recent … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(42 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Long term average concentrations of PM 2.5 (atmospheric fine particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 2.5m) in China has been observed at extremely high levels over a considerable amount of time over the last two decades, attracting widespread attention due to its harmful impacts on visibility, human health (mental and physical health), traffic safety, construction, economy , nature, and its interaction with climate (Liang et al, 2016). Previous studies have pointed out that coal combustion, motor vehicle emissions and industrial sources are major PM 2.5 sources in China, while domestic fuel burning, biomass burning, other anthropogenic emissions sources, as well as dust also contribute to PM 2.5 concentration in China as well (Cohen & Wang, 2014;Huo et al, 2011;Karagulian et al, 2015;Wang, Cohen, et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2007). PM 2.5 comprises of inorganic sources such as sulfate, nitrate, and mineral dust, and organic sources such as organic carbon and black carbon (BC), with the portion of these components varying in degree based on the day of the year, source time, geographic region, and local meteorology, among other factors (Deng et al, 2021;Ding et al, 2016;Wang, Wang, et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Long term average concentrations of PM 2.5 (atmospheric fine particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 2.5m) in China has been observed at extremely high levels over a considerable amount of time over the last two decades, attracting widespread attention due to its harmful impacts on visibility, human health (mental and physical health), traffic safety, construction, economy , nature, and its interaction with climate (Liang et al, 2016). Previous studies have pointed out that coal combustion, motor vehicle emissions and industrial sources are major PM 2.5 sources in China, while domestic fuel burning, biomass burning, other anthropogenic emissions sources, as well as dust also contribute to PM 2.5 concentration in China as well (Cohen & Wang, 2014;Huo et al, 2011;Karagulian et al, 2015;Wang, Cohen, et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2007). PM 2.5 comprises of inorganic sources such as sulfate, nitrate, and mineral dust, and organic sources such as organic carbon and black carbon (BC), with the portion of these components varying in degree based on the day of the year, source time, geographic region, and local meteorology, among other factors (Deng et al, 2021;Ding et al, 2016;Wang, Wang, et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some instruments, such as the Nimbus Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS), the Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument (Huang et al), and Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME), etc., can derive ozone amounts and its vertical profiles in the stratosphere, while in general tropospheric ozone detection is less sensitive (Bak et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2004;Martin, 2008;Miyazaki et al, 2019), due to the fact that the majority of the vertically integrated O 3 column is found in the stratosphere. At the present time, the best remote sensing can generally do for tropospheric ozone is to make observations of the lower troposphere (not only confined to the surface or the boundary layer) over highly polluted regions, in which case there still remains a large bias (of or greater than 10%) with respect to measurements (Liu et al, 2005;Kajino et al, 2019). There are also point-measurements made by upward looking O 3 LIDAR, but these results are highly limited in space and also tend to also be error prone (Steinbrecht et al, 2009;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Space-borne tropospheric O 3 regime identification has been carried out over large spatial areas; however, the ability to infer surface O 3 levels from these studies has been limited by the uncertainties in O 3 precursors from tropospheric column integration quantities that are based on precursor distribution probabilities [36,37]. However, with the help of sophisticated satellite retrieval algorithms, it has recently become possible to extract lower free tropospheric O 3 precursors from satellite signals [38][39][40][41][42], enabling large-scale spatiotemporal analysis of lower tropospheric O 3 concentrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1-1 in the Supplement. The offline coupled version has been used for various purposes, such as the simulation of dust vortices in the Taklimakan Desert (Yumimoto et al, 2019), the simulation of the dispersion and deposition of radionuclides due to the Fukushima nuclear accident (Kajino et al, 2019b(Kajino et al, , 2021Sekiyama and Kajino, 2020), simulation of lower-tropospheric ozone in East Asia (Kajino et al, 2019c), and the simulation of transition metals in East Asia (Kajino et al, 2020). Other meteorological models, such as the Weather Research and Forecast model (WRF; Skamarock et al, 2008), ASUCA (JMA, 2014;Aranami et al, 2015), and Scalable Computing for Advanced Library and Environment (SCALE; Nishizawa et al, 2015, can be used for offline coupled simulations (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%