2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.endinu.2016.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detección inmunohistoquímica de la mutación BRAF V600E en el carcinoma papilar de tiroides. Evaluación frente a la reacción en cadena de la polimerasa en tiempo real

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, as a universal explanation, one can consider the heterogeneity of the tumor and the fact that the immunohistochemically analyzed tissue was not exactly the same tissue fragment examined by RT-PCR. Finally, the expression on mRNA and protein levels was not always synchronized ( 23 , 24 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as a universal explanation, one can consider the heterogeneity of the tumor and the fact that the immunohistochemically analyzed tissue was not exactly the same tissue fragment examined by RT-PCR. Finally, the expression on mRNA and protein levels was not always synchronized ( 23 , 24 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the literature review, possible explanations for VE1 IHC false negatives could be technical (suboptimal fixation condition, tissue ischemia in perinecrotic zones) [38,48] or functional (loss of expression of mutation antigen, presence of additional mutation preventing translocation of mutated mRNA into functional protein) [43]. As it could be learned from our series, tumors with VE1 immunoreactivity but negative results of Sanger sequencing represented false negative sequencing but not false positive IHC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Although Sanger sequencing has been widely acknowledged as the standard technique for detection of point mutation, from the literature review, we found out that the discordant rates are much higher when using Sanger sequencing (7-23%) to validate the performance of VE1 IHC [20,23,25,31,35,[38][39][40], than using a more sensitive molecular method, such as real-time PCR (0.1-8%) [19,22,23,[41][42][43][44][45]. Several groups achieved a discordance rate of < 2% when VE1 immunostaining was compared to real-time PCR [22,43]. Jung et al used RNA-ISH, and their discordant rate was 1.9% [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation